• 1 Post
  • 88 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: April 30th, 2024

help-circle

  • I agree with all those points.

    I don’t know if adding exceptional cases to de equation adds to the argument or not. But there are many instances where the ones selling the product are not the ones that made it, and the ones that made it will never see a penny of what you paid for. This is true in old games/media, where rights were bought long ago by corporations and creators see nothing. Also true in any big production made by a big corporation with many workers. The workers who actually create the IP were paid by hour, while corporations and investors get to keep milking the product after creators had been paid.

    This will invalidate any argument about creators getting compensated for their work. For those cases at least.




  • Not really.

    Firstly they never said that they would turn him to the US. They said that they would turn him to a third country. And only if irrefutable evidence of his guilt were to be provided. And they said that the only would turn Bin Laden, not any other AlQaeda members.

    Algo this happened after they US started the bombings. Before the US attacked the Talibans refused to even talk about it. And they would probably just tried to make time to start a truce until Bin Laden left the country.

    So it was actually a fake proposal and only after their previous refusal started the bombings on Afghanistan.


  • I’m operating on the not so ignorant notion than the Taliban supported Al-Qaeda and its ways for decades, becoming a safe haven for Bin Laden and other terrorists.

    They had no issues with terrorism and supported the use of terrorism against the infidels.

    Being also targeted by other islamist terrorists doesn’t clean their history with support of international terrorism.



  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoMemes@lemmy.mlI hate the rich
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    I cheated a little. As I’m employed by a public organization of the Spanish government. But it’s true that we achieved these conditions because we have massive Unions here in the public sector. We are currently threatening with a strike if the remove remote work (as they are threatening to remove it).


  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneNegativity rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    AI does not aim to replace the artist. That is beyond the reach of the technology.

    Generative AI aims to make one artist produce more art in less time. Same as digital art or photography with respect to portraits.

    What capitalist companies do with a technology is always bad. That’s why I do not like capitalism. But primitivism and halting progress is not the solution. If capitalism is causing issues maybe the solution is ending capitalism.


  • Instance picking can be overwhelming. Making people just not even try it.

    I do think a big challenge for the fediverse is how to ease that. And make it like e-mail where @whocares is not that important and it’s easy to actually have a custom domain/instance.

    And, of course, to achieve this instance admins should be really be responsible with defederations and bans. And only use it as last resort, probably only because of legal reasons. Not because “I don’t like that instance admins main political thesis”. Probably that kind of blocks are better to be left to the user.



  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneNegativity rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    You’ll know how much the means of creating art have changed over the centuries. Different or more time efficient does not mean worse.

    Also if you have been an artist for a few decades now you’d been alive while digital art was introduced and the complains it raised to traditional artists.

    Complains here are very similar to those. It’s just a new tool. It can be used to do good of bad art same as a Photoshop brush. And Adobe is as bad and big corporations (probably bigger and worse) than openAI.

    And no, making AI art is not instant. Neither just writing “make me a nice bunnie” and enjoy. It also have a process, with many steps, iterations and that if what you aim to do is something good a lot of times it needs to be complete with traditional digital art. Once again, it’s just a tool, how it’s used is up to the artist.

    I perfectly know that this is not about the “integrity of art”. This is mostly about “commission art” or “industrial filling art”(like videogame not important assets, backgrounds, etc) that it was paying the bills for many people and it has been incredibly threatened by generative AI as for the people paying for that type of art the results of an AI model are good enough for a fraction of the price.

    But again, it’s the same that happened before with digital art. Before there were a need for way more traditional artists jobs for the same result as fewer digital artists.

    Progress has always killed jobs, and people have need to learn new skills. That’s why we need social protection systems so people can keep employed despite that.



  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneNegativity rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    I don’t think it’s like that.

    The worst of AI is how is being pushed by big corporations in every product to “sell better” and “collect more data”.

    But there are plenty of legitimate uses for both AI as a concept and in particular generative LLMs.

    Are you telling me that the people who use AI to spice up their RPG sessions with images and text are the devil??

    Sometimes I feel like anti-AI is reaching religion levels of dogmatism. It’s too early for a butlerian jihad.