Gonna have to see those videos

ah, hadn‘t checked that. thanks

Which function does Dugin have in the Russian state at the moment?

Ok Junge, ich übersetze es dir: Erklär und beweis uns den Zusammenhang zwischen Gesichtsschleier und öffentlicher Sicherheit. Ich übersetz es dann auch gern. Und ja, wenn du Behauptungen aufstellst solltest du sie auch beweisen können.

Sorry for shouting in German. I thought you‘d speak that, because it felt you had skin in the game. Anyway, I also think you should explain how a veil and public safety correlate. If you can‘t do it in your own words, you provide a link.

Exactly, why post a somewhat nuanced BBC piece, when you got the real deal. It’s not a related article, this one gives us more than just speculation, it tells us the facts that don’t need any evidence.

Even the sabotage of the French railways at the beginning of the Olympics is being attributed to Russia in this “analysis”. Without a doubt.

Also in the article:

It is important to separate the known facts from the allegations being made and suspicions voiced by Western officials.

because speculation without evidence might just be propaganda

Thanks, we’ve already read the press release

what‘s this inclusive economy he‘s talking about?

sorry, what? I never heard of programs recruiting refugees in Europe for the war in Ukraine, do you have a source for that?

Edit: or do you mean Ukrainian refugees?

And I don‘t know what‘s going on with them. There weren’t any updates for years, now there is a design overhaul, no new features and suddenly they want me to register. Duck

NATO becoming aware of strategic mistakes?

This hasn’t been stated as a reason for the duties, has it?

Removed by mod

Because Fascists want control from the ground up.

So?

Yeah I know the EU is just as adamant on the free market as the US as long as it doesn’t concern themselves. This statement has been accurate for more than 100 years. They subsidise, the Chinese subsidise, and still Chinese cars sold in Europe are still way more expensive than in China itself. It’s laughable to just blindly repeat all the government lines.

But he insisted the EU would no longer be “naive” about massive government subsidies, though he offered some hope the two sides would find a way out of the row.

Blatant hypocrisy

Ah! We‘ll be less reliant on China, when we hold on to old technology and let them do the progress thing. Interesting thinking. Wouldn’t want to work in this guy’s company.

except in the most urgent cases.

you left that out. That and considering what the case was actually about casts a doubt on your joyful analysis.

I guess he was just polite, assuming someone making all those false claims would at least do it with some purpose.