• 1 Post
  • 2.37K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle
  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.workstoLinux@lemmy.mlX11 vs Wayland
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You just attack me personally the whole time with wrong accusations, instead bringing arguments for or against Wayland and X11.

    I very clearly attacked your argument (not you) as “Poisoning the Well”. Sounds like you’re not familiar with logical fallacies, I highly recommend reading up on them.

    you call me anti X11

    Yes - that was me doing to you what you did to the author to show by example. You took that as an insult which is why I say calling the author of that article “anti-wayland” is well-poisoning. You’ve set the tone that the article is not to be taken seriously because of a perceived bias on the part of the author. You “besmirched” their reputation to, by association, attack the argument. This is practically the definition of Poisoning the Well.

    Just because I call the article Anti Wayland. That’s it, that is your basis.

    Yes - that was the fallacy. The “well-poisoning” if you will. If you simply said “Here is an article that points out some of the problems with Wayland” or something to that effect I wouldn’t have taken any issue.


  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.workstoLinux@lemmy.mlX11 vs Wayland
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wayland breaks everything is right in the title. Did you even look into the link before you accuse ME of propaganda? I did not poison the well and left my opinion out. The article IS anti Wayland, and that is not my opinion and does not reflect my opinion. You should stop right there.

    You’re just anti-X11.


  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.workstoLinux@lemmy.mlX11 vs Wayland
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    The author is anti Wayland

    The authors’ point of view does not matter. You’ve poisoned the well by presenting the data collected as potentially “tainted” by a bias that, even if true, does not change the data presented.

    So yes - clearly and very obviously poisoning the well. Textbook really.

    Why don’t you do that?

    The link you provided actually did that. But they are “anti-wayland”…

    Edit: and I’ll push back hard on the “anti-wayland” language as well. This is propaganda-style speech. People can “not like things” and disagree. But labeling somebody “anti-x” diminishes their opinions and ideas.



  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.workstoLinux@lemmy.mlX11 vs Wayland
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wayland doesn’t plan on changing anything about this issue.

    This seems to be a common pattern with the Wayland team. They seem very focused on some technical ideology for how “things should work” to the point of ignoring or dismissing real-world issues.

    Perhaps in another 20 years they’ll get around to addressing it.


  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.workstoLinux@lemmy.mlX11 vs Wayland
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Think twice before abandoning X11. Wayland breaks everything! is more of an anti Wayland posting, but its good to have a view from all angles. So I post it here.

    I like how you slightly poison the well there ("more of an anti Wayland posting) rather than pointing out that Wayland has very real problems even after >10 years of development.