

I laughed and cried too much about this.
I laughed and cried too much about this.
I remember having tried to use a service before, and after trying my email address I got the error message that only hotmail, gmail, and icloud email addresses were allowed. Luckily I didn’t really need the service, so I noped out if there real quick.
I guess wors in general are good at pirtraying their meanings/definitions? ┐(゚ ~゚ )┌
I laughed too hard about this.
The true thought dilemmas of human nature. Is something only a shower thought or was enough thinking involved to consider it mildly interesting.
I miss those nature shows. They are way more interesting than they sound on paper. Thanks for reminding me of those and solving my analysis paralysis.
This sounds like what tge commission was saying, right? The court did not rule against them per se, it just said all the rules of tge game actually have to be codified which is fair.
This is what I was thinking. Most people probably just come together algorithmically or by having played a round together, and not necessarily by search. If there is the need to search for a specific player, there is also often a second player ID that can be used instead of the display name.
How is it that there is always a fitting xkcd no matter what kind of hilarious situation is mentioned?
As another dev I agree with the other reply. Even if it seems really small, it still is something that should eventually get fixed and therefore can be considered a bug. It makes it easier to track everything that needs to be done if it is all in thr bug tracker. Worst case scenario if it is considered irrelevant it will just be given an extremely low priority in the bug tracker.
Oh, so that is how those headphones work. I had an MRI a long time ago as a child, and really can’t remember much about it at all.
Was it really the headphones being low quality or is the MRI just so loud that any headphones would sound terrible?
I thought the reason that Nintendo was always able to win these copyright accusations was due to Japan’s strict copyright laws. But if I read correctly, this was fought over in a US court, or am I misunderstanding something?
And this is why double negatives are in general frowned upon in the English language, because they make the content much more difficult to understand.
You had me in the last sentence… sadly
I’m not sure if I understand completely correctly what white label websites are, but also maybe the themes made for the Hugo website building program?
Sad, but also kind of funny that the true original apparently survived. I guess this means it will just be rebuilt again?
Personally, I do not think that there is a purpose in speaking well about it. That being said I would also not speak badly about it. My own moral compass would be speak badly about the conpanies that deserve to be gotten rid of and simply use the companies that provide decent services. No need to praise a company for offering a decent service.
Kayak? I’m really having trouble imagining how that works. Is that still normal police giving out the DUI or some kind of water police along a beach? Could you explain some more to put my imagination at ease?
When did these stories start switching over from intentionally abusing peoples data to having data breaches? I feel like the worst ended up still getting worse somehow.