Usually "too vague " is an excuse to find loopholes.

Because of lobbying

I didn’t understand from the article, who’s the lander? It sounds like a huge dept trap, am I wrong?

How many times do I have to answer this question!?

In places it’s not implemented yet it’s because of mostly the work of lobbiests and land owners engagement in politics.

Things and policies in a democracy don’t just catch on, they must be fought over. Thankfully the fight is mostly by political activisn and nothing worse

Not surprising, but at least we got the numbers.

Not the onion material

People that need parking spaces choose their representatives and attend city halls. May we need to do the same…

It’s hard to think beyond the individualistic businesses oriented thinking. I see you, it’s ok.

But I was thinking about public parking spaces.

The point is, parking minimums should include area maximum. But yeah it seems they are especially designed to be awefull…

That’s what regulations are for

What’s wrong with underground parkings?

Is this, like, satire?

Next thing you know, the left wing party will get plurality of the votes, but tge President will give the right wing pro corporation party to form the government.

Oh…

FINALLY A supreme court that does what it should be doing everywhere: protect democracy!

Yessss! I wish you success!

Exactly

Yeah, perfect analogy… Like all the AI pictures in your profile…

I remember the American’s genociding native americans. How far back would you go, to keep the coversation at a shallow finger pointing name calling slogans?