it depends a lot on how you are using them tools wise. as a sharding database for document storage they are nearly equivalent. when it comes to ecosystem opensearch’s is smaller and a bit more specialized but very open. elasticsearch has a lot more fancy enterprise tooling and tools but can be annoying to work with unless you have a full license for all the features. it’s better to ask what is your use case/expectations and choose based on that.

can you explain what you mean? what do you mean by verify? the contents integrity(a checksum)? the ability to confirm it was not modified once distributed (Public key cryptography e.g. PGP)? something else?

This all comes down to the old adage “You’re judged by the company you keep”. Being an admin choosing not to interact with or banning/blocking those that you or your community would find harmful is part of the job. That doesn’t make them an asshole. Whether you like it or not you have surrounded yourself with a significant number of problematic topics and stances and people are going out of the way to distance themselves from you. online communication mediums are not guaranteed and participation is optional. You may want to consider why others are treating you this way and why it continues to happen. take a step back and really consider what has been said, the good news is that if you want to change you can, the online sphere cares very little about who you are and a lot about how you treat and communicate with others. If you actually take the time for introspection and change You’ll likely have no issues going forward choosing some other account. Otherwise this will likely happen again and again no matter what.

Checked who the author was, should have guessed… SJVN. He certainly has a flair for taking something relatively small, that a solution already exists for and suggesting something bureaucratic, unnecessary, and completely outside his technical competence. This is one of those things that the kernel devs can, and will solve when it’s a real problem. Random journalists and armchair experts can wait till they’re called upon.

You’re going to have a hard time getting anyone to say in any concrete way that one license or another is compatible because apple has never stated which licenses are compatible or not. they only point at the terms of service and tell you to figure it out yourself and be prepared for apple to remove it at any time if they disagree with you/your lawyer.

IANAL but in general you can choose a wide variety of permissive licenses like: MIT/ISC Apache 2 or the BSD (2/3) clause licenses

Copyleft licenses are pretty much incompatible based on most agreed upon terms but maybe you have a fleet of lawyers better than apples that are willing to fight it out :)

MIT is still libre per GNU definition. https://www.gnu.org/gwm/libredocxml/x15.html I assume you mean copyleft for software license. closest thing to copyleft in creative commons is cc by-sa https://pitt.libguides.com/ld.php?content_id=18024633.