you’re probably an idiot. I know I am.

  • 1 Post
  • 225 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 3rd, 2023

help-circle
  • Vespair@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlHow many do you recognize?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Call me the fun police, but I don’t think we need to raise Lemmy power users to the position of micro celebrities, and I don’t find this kind of circle jerking cute.

    And I say this as somebody with positive opinions of many of the people referenced.

    It’s just like… Weird and kind of lame, tbh.


  • Vespair@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlFinally, Inner Peace!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Remember kids, nothing doesn’t apply to you, everything was made specifically for you. If you find yourself in a community that seems like it doesn’t apply to you, remember that you’re never in the wrong place, obviously it is that community who is in the wrong.



  • Vespair@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlgetting pricey...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah to be clear, if it sounded like anything I said was meant as absolution, it was not. Regardless of which camp they fall into or how they display their wealth, it is impossible, to the best of my reasoned understanding, to acquire mass wealth ethically. I assume all of the ultra-wealthy are morally compromised in some capacity or another until proven otherwise.


  • Vespair@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlgetting pricey...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think there are kind of two different groups that get conflated, actually: the wealthy, and the “professionally wealthy.” The wealthy are often discrete and not showy, but the “professional wealthy” are those whose wealth or fame itself is central to their empire, even if not as directly as the influencer wealthy. But these are the Kardashians and the socialites and tech bros, all of those who serve as sort of aspirational versions of wealth. There is no shortage of them, no doubt, and I’m sure even the quietly wealthy have a lavish indulgence or two (a yacht being very likely), but based on my experience I really think there are sort two clear and distinct communities of wealth.


  • Vespair@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlgetting pricey...
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve known some disgusting rich people (born and raised in the wealthiest county in the entire country) - for some reason they love Costco. They don’t even do their own shopping but they insist on Costco. Unless they’re aggressively right-wing.





  • You have already been paying Google for that 6+ hours before even a penny came out of your account - you’re just been paying in data. We have to stop pretending Google is some good guy that left an open platform in the world and just said “if you use it we’ll show you some ads.”

    Ads aren’t even the main revenue stream for Youtube, data is. All of these points about “paying for a service” become moot the moment we acknowledge the value of the data Google is farming from our interactions. This is how we’re paying for Youtube. If you choose to buy Youtube Premium, understand that you’re paying to not have ad interruption. You aren’t paying for Youtube, because that was already happening, you’re just paying for the convenience of avoid ads.


  • Don’t be disingenuous. We are already paying for that service, in our data and attention.

    It would be an entirely different story if paying for Youtube Premium immediately opted you out of participating in Google’s data-mining and data-selling, and if paying for Youtube Premium removed not just the overt ads but the algorithmically-manipulated advertising content as well (what is the effective difference between a Pepsi ad and a Good Mythical Morning video titled “trying every new Pepsi flavor”?), but it since it DOESN’T do those then we aren’t talking about paying for a service - we are talking about a company asking for every penny in our wallet for a service which we are already paying for.



  • Vespair@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlMe but ublock origin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Even when you aren’t seeing ads their algorithm is still controlling your front page, allowing them to push partner content that isn’t directly advertising but still acts like it. The differences between a commercial for Doritos and an episode of Good Mythical Morning titled “Trying Every Doritos Flavor” from the perspective of the PepsiCo marketing department are that people might willingly click on the GMM video and they probably didn’t even have to pay anyone for the video to happen.
    Sure Rhett & Link may not have a partnership with Pepsi and are just innocently making content to give their audience (I genuinely believe this), so they’ve got no part in this becoming advertising, but you would have to be incredibly naïve to believe that Google’s algorithm isn’t smart enough to recognize that video and others like it as marketable content the promotion of which can be sold to PepsiCo.

    Premium subscribers may not be seeing ads, but they are absolutely still seeing advertising.

    edit: typos




  • Subtext. It’s the suggestion that these terms are so incomprehensible as to be overwhelming in the first place. The subtext is that the younger generation is exhausting, specifically in their nonsense or otherness. There’s assuming good faith and then there is intentionally ignoring the forest for the trees, and I think your suggestion is more for the latter than the former, frankly.