Lemmy account of natanox@chaos.social

  • 26 Posts
  • 639 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 7th, 2024

help-circle

  • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.detolinuxmemes@lemmy.world•Of course
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    On the contrary, the trust into LibreOffice will increase.

    It’s with slop code like it’s with furniture. Sure IKEA can bury you in cheap stuff, but no one in hell would honestly claim they’re better than hand-made stuff. However other than with furniture, in the digital space there is no scarcity, you can copy one brilliant thing endlessly.

    We already have lots of good software and lots of people wanting to make good software. Nobody needs fucking AI slop code except those who want us to become dependent on their services to extract “value”.


  • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.detolinuxmemes@lemmy.world•Of course
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Depends. Hand-written apps will still be more valuable than slopped ones as they’re far more trustworthy and less generic (like, literally), not to mention people being environmentally conscious about their choices. A good, trustworthy app that respects the user (and therefore omits e.g. privacy invasion) is still worth a few bucks to many.










  • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.detoMemes@sopuli.xyz•0-0
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Damn bro, you’re dense. Like, really.

    Social Media is just as addicitve. Only If you ignore the science, especially for social media.

    You’re really all in on ignoring literally everything else you can do with your Smartphone, huh? Just fyi, a lot of young people only have a smartphone and do everything with that. Internet in general, contact to friends, watch media etc. Your link is, again, a study about social media. There’s more to a Smartphone than that, believe it or not.

    I never said inherently.

    You literally equated it to drugs.

    How come suicide rates did not drop since the advent of the phone?

    You seem to imply that the phone is spmehow aiding psychological Regeneration (probably with all the Fake News, the constant barrage of negativity, sexialized Advertisement etc. I bet that is curing)

    But somehow the rates are as High as the 1930s

    So the “escape” and “coping mechanism” does not work as such. The mid 30s need to accept that. Nope, never said that. Coping is not curing, it’s a survival strategy.

    Nope, never said that. You obviously do not even know what coping even is (The mid 30s are apparently smarter than you about this). Here, read a Wikipedia. It’s not about curing, never was. It’s a emotional management and mental survival strategy, and there are good and bad ones. The only thing you managed to do is show to a strawman that social media can be pretty bad (duh), and somehow equate that to taking the whole phone away. The phone that also is source of entertainment, social contacts, distraction (yes, also healthy coping) from whatever hurts them. And you want to take all of that away. That’s exactly the kind of boomershit I meant, and you’ve made yourself a perfect negative example.

    Anyway, enough of this nonsense.









  • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.detoMemes@sopuli.xyz•0-0
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    Wow, equating a child’s coping mechanism and trauma escapes with giving them drugs is a low that’s genuinely impressive. And infuriating.

    I never said anything against therapy, that’s of course essential. So is making sure there is no immediately harmful stuff around them (which entertainment, games and social interactions via internet that are used to cope are NOT fucking part of). But taking away their coping mechanism is literally the worst thing you can do and will only inflict even more damage.

    I went through this fucking shit two decades ago (but with 2000’s computer & internet) and I’ll die on this hill. Implying that a phone is inherently damaging is regurgitated boomer bullshit, and taking it away if it’s their coping mechanism / outlet completely from a traumatized child will lead to either estrangement later or suicide earlier.