Tasty rule #1: herbivores are tasty.

Removed by mod

Moderator №1: banned!
Moderator №2: No, you can’t!
Moderator №3: How dare you!
Moderator №4: Fuck you, racist scum! Banned!
Moderator №6: A-a-a-a!

Stocks as “share prices”, not as “amount of ammunition in the warehouses”. Pffft.

Putin: Hey, I want that cup too. I’ll be next!

Read as “finish from beginning to end” or as “opened and get some paragraphs”?

Example: I’m not a kid anymore and lost interest in fiction literature a long time ago. But I still read technical literature. Of course this kind of books are significantly harder to read (and often there is no need to read them in full) so I don’t think I have read a book in full during the last year.

independent fact-checkers, paid by tax money

In my culture, there is a proverb that says, “The one who feeds the girl — dances with her.” Your variant is a straightforward censorship. No idea how it might work in the real world.

we should invest more in EU open source, promote more fact checking and open algorithms (or even banning them) for social media. What is happening with Twitter, Facebook and TikTok is not ok.

I have nothing against “invest more in EU open source” or “open algorithms” but let’s stop pretending that we don’t know where the governmental “regulation” leads. If you’re so afraid of people who might get some crazy ideas then humanity has an excellent method: education. People would be able to dismiss crazy ideas by themselves. But it works only for crazy and stupid ideas. Clever but anti-governmental ideas will linger.

Aren’t you on Lemmy specifically because of that?

Yes, that’s the reason. Overregulation.

Removed by mod

Yes, and kissing a traitor’s ass doesn’t help.

Just stop feeding them. Nintendo is bad, mkay? And their games are mediocre at best.

Were American cans of normal sizes, not American ones? Or Canada uses the Imperial system for beer?

Please stop telling this joke. It stopped being fun a few thousand iterations ago. And it wasn’t a good joke in the first place, to be honest.

Inthe case of the actual membership, members would be obligated to do at least something when Russia attack. In the case of fiction membership NATO might just budapesht-memorandum around.

Bacause in the case of “Future Russian Aggression” NATO will find literally THOUSANDS reasons why Ukraine can’t join or why that “Agression” isn’t agressive enough to call the 5th article.

Reddit moderators are unable to understand the context.

What exactly is the problem?

Trump: I am an Emperor of Great Again America. The whole world is America. Bring in doughnuts!!! Be amazed by my power.

Russians: hehehe. Unknown, pffft.

I see presidents and PMs. I don’t see leaders. Leaders… you know… lead. Leaders have some “vision” and can convince others. These people are just bureaucrats. Most of them are ok. Just not leaders.