Have you tried SFC /scannow, dism repair, or factory reset?

Are you sure you don’t have some client side dark mode on from your email client? It’s often the case that those don’t work too well, particularly if an email has an image background.

Buddy we have women “gooning” over Luigi Mangione, not a politician but his attractiveness is definitely not why he’s making rounds in the news

The word “gooner” has been diluted so much it’s not being used to describe basic words of attraction…

Privacy and pressure I’m guessing. Now the other person knows you’ve seen the message and the feeling of being perceived when you just want to send a message in your own time can be uncomfortable for some.

Yeah that’s partly what I meant by debugging

This is why even though English is my second language I will set software to be in English, I know any translations into my primary language will use weird and uncommon phrases (also makes debugging harder)

Does China actually import anything from the US?

Eh can’t really blame it for not being more open I think to customisation, it is an issue but not really a UX one I think. Any UI could be faulted for that then, not being customisable enough. As for apps not written for it again, not something they have control over. Could say the same about any DE, or even Mac or windows when they use non standard blocks

I disagree, they’ve got a consistent UX framework across the board, inputs are clear, navigation is the same across gdk apps. Is it consistent with other DEs? Not quite. But all gnome apps are easy to use, have pleasing UIs and generally share patterns that make it easy to see them as part of the same family even if an app is third party.

Ehhh flexibility is a good feature to have, but it’s not a requirement for good UX. Good UX should work for both beginner and advanced users, whether you do that through a single UI, different presets, or customizable panels depends on the use case and features available. A good music player for example doesn’t need a highly flexible UI to have good UX.

If anything, a good UX should know what tools people use most and how the rest of the market does theirs to have something that’s transferrable but also that works well with your feature set and brand vision

Not necessarily, but humans are creatures of habit. If your app doesn’t follow existing patterns, you better have a good reason for it.

It is true however that UX research is pretty poor on Linux, outside of say Gnome, but I think Linux apps could also take notes from market leaders and see what works from them and why.

It’s not always just a spreadsheet comparison of features, it’s considering the UX for different screens and user journeys and comparing them to one another.

That is a bandaid though, it’s an abstract way of interacting with an application and you can’t really build muscle memory around it

The problem is even if a designer contributes (say they open an issue with design feedback or even wireframes and such) developers seldom see as much value in a redesign as there is in working on features they care about, because open source is driven by developers making apps that they would use firstly.

The year of GOG lmao

Here’s some thoughts I posted on a different post https://lemmy.world/comment/15822959 I was running jellyfin off the same server and hardware as Plex, yet it’s less efficient and performant.

Hey you should look into darktable, it’s got a different learning curve from regular photo editing software but it’s really nice to use. Alternatively Rawtherapee is closer to lightroom in UX. Both FOSS

“dummy” name calling? Hahaha

I know dummy, I meant the ad supplying platforms reviewing them

I didn’t say ads can’t contain malware, but it’s a bit of a “(some) internet malware is ads, but not all ads are malware” scenario, it’s very dependent on who they get the ads from and how tight those ads get reviewed. Broad statements like that are just ignorant, and I say that as someone who uses an adblock on all of their devices.