but yes it addresses his point.

No, it doesn’t.

His entire point is that subway trains have a lot of doors, leading to a lower seat/door ratio. Your response doesn’t at all address that this ratio would change, or the actual repercussions of changing it.

In other words, you don’t know what you’re talking about, but you’re acting like you do.

You’re very adversarial for some reason so ciao.

I am matter-of-factly telling you that you’re not making a relevant point. If that’s “adversarial” to you, then you need to get your detector calibrated.

That scenario is assuming it’s not packed, and that there is only one person trying to do it.

Which is exactly why you didn’t address anything he said, and why this still doesn’t.

That doesn’t address anything he said.

They’re not search engine indexable though.

You can’t view it without logging in.

It has no bike lanes. (Yet)

That’s literally one way allergies form.

https://evidence.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/EVIDoa2300311

Exposure to allergens makes you less likely to be allergic to them.

My username is not my identity.

Get a life.

Do you not know how this site works

It is decentralized.

Do you also attack dictionaries for explaining offensive words?

If they use them in an obviously offensive way, yes.

The person who gave the explanation is the same person who initially used it to mean offense. You can check the usernames to see exactly this.

They’re an ass. There is no messenger.