an 8-year-old girl and an 11-year-old boy are among the dead.

Great way to radicalize the next generation.

I’m not even sure they need the unpaid fare excuse tbh.

Also car height.
I’ve been hit by a car about 20 years ago and I kinda just rolled on top of it and landed behind confused with a few scrapes.
Getting hit by a car whose bumper is about shoulder height is much more likely to kill you.

Honestly, I wish I had properly learned how to use that thing when I was younger.

I taught myself to sew by hand just fine and it’s a useful skill in life for various smaller stuff, repairs, etc.
Still, the machine would make a few things much easier.

The machine does not agree with me.

Yea, view-once features in apps are mostly an illusion that’s oversold.

We have something close to some sort of an actual view once thing at work… it involves controlled access into secure rooms with no windows, lawyers, NDAs, security takes your phone and whatnot kinda deal.

A self destructing message is better than nothing, but hardly a guarantee

yawn

Even if it was, employers have all kinds of software running on employee workstations, some including keyloggers and screenshots, etc

Nothing is private on a device you don’t own.

Probably something for @jerry@fedia.io

Thanks, that’s an interesting read.
I know that’s one person’s opinion and not a thorough research, but that’s still plenty of red flags.

I’ve used the 100 searches in the free trial, thought the search was fine, better than Google’s these days. The subscription is a bit steep so I held off, kinda glad I did after digging more into this.

Having what little employees they have also make a mac-only browser, AI stuff and email that their user base doesn’t seem to want is all a bit weird.
Buying a t-shirt factory (wtf) with the money they could have used to potentially lower the subscription, but decided to burn through it to give out free t-shirts. That just screams narcissism-driven to me.

Their vague statements on privacy isn’t convincing at all.
Some variation of “we don’t care about your data” isn’t in any way compelling evidence that you care about protecting the privacy of said collected data.

In my opinion they lack focus, commitment and conviction into what I thought was their primary mission at first glance: being a privacy-focused no nonsense search engine.
Although that’s probably on me for reading what I wanted to see between the lines and that never was their stated mission, which would explain a lot.

He and his brother… damn.

Probably OP replaced the word spoiler that’s added automatically instead of replacing just the title.

He’s actually working undercover for the Big Bear consortium, pushing women to choose the bear one comment at a time.

It’s missing the word spoiler between the ::: and the header

Like…

::: spoiler header
Content
:::

OP is a racist jumping through alt accounts. In their mind, they’re making of fun of some imaginary dissonance between people liking the person in the top image and not liking the person in the bottom image.

They only ever see through the perspective of a racist.
In their tiny mind, “other race = inherently bad”, so to them, non-racist people must surely be going… “other race = inherently good”.

To them, race here was some magic card they can pull out as a gotcha, as if we should like Musk because he’s African.

Their little brain cannot fathom we might dislike Musk because he’s a billionaire narcissist sociopath and not because he was born in Africa.

Sure

[…] de la journée pour les enfants de moins de six semaines de travail.

Would be something like…
[…] of the day for the kids of less than six weeks of work.

It didn’t make sense in French either.

Incel dolphin kaijū

Women are not comfortable hosting the same square button labeled as a water heater de la journée pour les enfants de moins de six semaines de travail.

Autocorrect aneurysm posting

The same applies to pictures of hikes. Sure you can take a nice panorama but that doesn’t do justice to actually being there.