Lawyers will also usually advice the safer option. Even if your actions are legal, if its boarderline enough you have to defend your actions in court, its expensive and risky.

you did 🙀

how about a second puberty, as a treat?

my rival is called Butts (a very funny name)

I think the diverging diamond interchange is terrible. Because of the crossover, traffic can only cross the interchange in one direction at a time, so most of the traffic in the interchange is not moving most of the time.

A pair of roundabouts connected to on ramps eliminates the danger of left turns without stopping the majority of traffic most of the time.

A massive overbuilt interchange that cannot function without traffic lights is the opposite of elegant.

Ublock origin’s website says to use ublock origin lite, which is a manifest v3 version that should continue to work albeit not as well.

Some chromium based browsers will continue supporting v2 extensions. Chromium is said to continue v2 support until June 2025.

Firefox is the best choice as they have no plans to drop the support ublock origin relies on.

I never leave so that’s why I don’t post. :3

I browse subscribed communities, so most of my feed is slightly deranged trans memes.

I’ve not used windows regularly since XP but I recall being very confused that the keyboard layout setting defaults to being per-application rather than syatemwide. Don’t know if that’s how its still done and I have no reason to care.

🫵 found

Not when the voterbase has common interests.

Who wants to decode this key? Would be fun and easy!

deleted by creator

Sounds like you want trademark reform.

There are basically no requirements for maintaining trademarks. If a company owns a name they can use that name and branding forever, no matter how false it becomes, no matter how much the business or product changes, they can keep the name. This shouldn’t be the case.

If an ice cream company is named after their two founders, the company shouldn’t be able to keep using their names after they’re no longer involved. But under current laws they can.

A glass company can build its reputation on making heatproof glass, then change the glass so its no longer heatproof, while still selling it under the same name. This is unjust.

Companies should be forced to rebrand upon major changes. Current trade mark laws are fundamentally misleading.

IMO, we need to diversify our EV makers and help provide the capital to bootstrap it.

Good business when the us does it, evil market destroying subsidies when china.

It sure makes it slower to type I don’t like it.

Why is the beginning of each word in bold? Is there something wrong with OP’s browser or the screeenshotted website?

no u

You are the best for the world ❤️

French autocorrect 😱