I mean murdering people is extremist.

Taking their money would achieve the same.

Most of the time yeah. But it depends as you can write c# with very little GC use if you avoid allocations.

Ahead of time compiling also gets things much closer. But then you lose runtime optimization.

Actually jit languages can outperform compiled languages by using runtime analysis to perform tiered compilation and profile guided optimisations.

C# has made some great strides in this regard.

All the normal optimisations are applied when it is compiled to byte code. Like loop unrolling etc.

Then once it detects the hot paths during execution it can apply even more based on how it is called. It can also do optimisations that aren’t possible at initial compile time.

Dynamic PGO it’s called. It’s a really interesting topic.

That is literally the worst use case for AIs. There’s no way they should be letting it provide contact info like that.

Also they’re stupid for dialing a random number.

Use your bed only for sleep. No screens for a few hours before bed. Milk before bed. Reading or audio books are a great way to settle your mind.

If you aren’t asleep after 30 or so minutes get up and do something chilled for a little bit. Laying there getting pissed you aren’t asleep doesn’t help.

Stick to a sleep / wake schedule. I’ve found getting up early and consistently much more effective for sorting out my sleep.

I’m fairly sure use after free isn’t possible unless you explicitly use unsafe code right?

It’s compiler enforced is the point.

That sounds like a comment written by somebody who has no idea what the article says

If you actually had infinite monkeys it would be the first thing a very large (infinite) amount would type.

2.6% increase in thread ops when copying data from user space seems pretty significant.

The numbers put out by Ukraine have been 1000+ consistently for quite a while now.

How is interest on Russian assets your tax dollars?

Honestly I would just commit your in progress work then on the other machine check it out and reset to the previous commit.

Then you have your in progress work on the new machine with no random commits.

You could set up an alias that does commit with message “switching machines” and pushes.

Similar have one that pulls and resets.

I’m sure it was very common. But that’s whataboutism and it’s definitely worth noting.

He enslaved people as he travelled

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/12/us/christopher-columbus-slavery-disease-trnd/index.html

Holy crap lol this response made OPs edit the most incorrect thing I’ve ever seen.

No it’s not. It’s pedantic and arguing semantics. It is essentially useless and a waste of everyone’s time.

It applies a statistical model and returns an analysis.

I’ve never heard anyone argue when you say they used a computer to analyse it.

It’s just the same AI bad bullshit and it’s tiring in every single thread about them.

I literally quoted the word for that exact reason. It just gets really tiring when you talk about AIs and someone always has to make this point. We all know they don’t think or understand in the same way we do. No one gains anything by it being pointed out constantly.

I mean they literally do analyze text. They’re great at it. Give it some text and it will analyze it really well. I do it with code at work all the time.

Because they are two completely different tasks. Asking them to recall information from their training is a very bad use. Asking them to analyze information passed into them is what they are great at.

Give it a sample of code and it will very accurately analyse and explain it. Ask it to generate code and the results are wildly varied in accuracy.

I’m not assuming anything you can literally go and use one right now and see.

One of LLMs main strengths over traditional text analysis tools is the ability to “understand” context.

They are bad at generating factual responses. They are amazing at analysing text.

I mean it’s not hard so much as very dated and a bit shit.

I could use raw pointers in c# if I wanted to. But it’s just not a great way to do things.

C will likely have a place where low languages are required for a long time. But everywhere else there’s little reason to choose over more modern languages.