Try it out. It is a great utility.
Try it out. It is a great utility.
I went from GUI to terminal and I’ll never go back. Especially with interactive add, git add -i
Debian is 30 years old for a reason.
Cotton Eye Joe
This is the answer.
I liked Ubuntu prior to snap. I’ve gone back to Debian and aside from a slightly complex install, I think that the distro is the epitome of stability and “just works”, especially for the normal software stuff I do. It’s 30 years old for a reason.
My experiences with arch are that it just broke if you looked at it funny and I like stuff that doesn’t require the constant tinkering. This is the same reason I don’t do smart tech and still own dumb and mechanical watches.
I feel like I’m in the minority in this community lately.
And honestly, nano as the default makes sense, it’s lightweight and gets the job done. I still have that as my default.
Honestly, most of the defaults are good enough for me. I just run vi and it does the job well enough. If I need to configure a good dev environment, I’ll just install stuff with apt-get install and mangle stuff onto my PATH.
Debian, because I can just have a computer without needing to fiddle with a million things. I work in tech and don’t want to mess with any more code or configurations if I’m on my own computer. It’s worked for me for 5 years and has worked for others for 30 years.
What’s with everyone recommending a different distro instead of trying to help the user in the thread?
Color me confused, but what’s wrong with stock Debian?
Regular expressions