Denixen

What if it was the other way around? They had multiple partners so you had to spend less time keeping them happy? Seems like a win win, you have to spend less at the chores of the relationship and they gets to be more happy, content and taken care of!

Looks AI generated though. Can we exclude that?

I knew this would happen, I talked about it with everyone for a year. LLMs need to be used more carefully and cannot replace workers, unless you want a far more expensive worker.

This is why I think Mistral AIs focus on small domain specific models that will start paying off once companies realize that renting a really expensive general model to do specific work is a waste of money compared to a small, possibly local and owned, model can do at a fraction of the cost.

Getting out of the atmosphere is the most costly part of space travel. So you want to get out of the atmosphere as soon as possible after launch. The fastest route out of the atmosphere is straight up. It really is that simple.

If you tried to go out it at an angle you would need so much more fuel, which would make the space craft bigger and heavier and more costly to get into space.

Going straight up with a rocket is the most cost efficient way of getting into space.

Ironically, this is probably the way it is going to go. As we keep going deeper into the information age, managing all the information thrown at us is becoming unmanageable. With the introduction of AI it will get worse, even as AI becomes the only way of handling the influx of information. Using machine learning has been a way to sort information for a long time (spam sorting is a type of AI after all) and present generative AI are an evolution of that.

These are spicy 🔥 beetles!

Iran’s original blockade still allowed Iran affiliated and Iran approved ships through. US blockade blocks those ships.

I am sorry I didn’t realize this was an echo chamber where you can only voice validating and approving opinions.

I mainly think banning SM is better than trying age verification or some other way to exclude children. If it is 99% toxic trash then it should just be banned.

Next in line is 99% of all porn, which is also toxic trash. If one applies the same logic as previously, then it should be banned too.

Unregulated use of morphine (heroine) is bad, thus we ban it.

It is interesting though how strongly you react to porn specifically getting banned. Maybe you should reflect on that.

Don’t worry, neither porn or social media will ever get banned :) but the fact that you react so negatively to it should perhaps make you reflect upon your own habits, the way people using social media should reflect upon theirs.

I have been pro banning all for-profit social media for years. I can live without Reddit. Especially now with Lemmy and fediverse. I can even live with no social media whatsoever. We should probably ban all porn too. It is just as brain rotting as social media. I say this as someone who does watch porn. I can live without it if society gets better from banning it.

They are not entirely wrong for not trusting them though. I have broken more than one Ubuntu installs… and I consider myself a semi-advanced user.

If more windows people join and Ubuntu wants to keep them, they need protection from doing stupid things like uninstalling all display and graphics drivers or system critical packages…

Don’t underestimate people’s stupidity, at least that something that Microsoft and apple get right.

How long before the EU parliament manages to sabotage this deal too?

Hehe this is the same “negotiation tactic” Trump uses. Sorry to bring politics in here.

I get what you are saying, but how many country names start with I and has a Q in the name? I might be wrong I think it is only Iraq?

I don’t understand, I just see a bunch of red lines. Where is the white?

Exactly, when people and organizations are selling their American stocks and companies and customers around the world stop buying American, there is less need for dollars. When the demand decreases, the price decrease.

It is not trivial, the existence of you job makes that self-evident. If it was trivial companies wouldn’t need a DPO, would they? I would love to see you walk up to your employer and tell them that your job is trivial and anyone can do it…

You might not see this yourself, but the fact that even a small company needs a DPO in order to interpret data protection regulation IS the problem! But I am sure you are not complaining… It needs to be simplified so a small company can be GDPR compliant without requiring a DPO.

This problem is recognized in the report from the EU commission linked in the article, which is why they are acting.

The fact that small startups cannot even take off because they cannot afford to hiring the bureaucrats required to interpret and be compliant with regulation is a massive problem and one of the reasons Europe’s economy is stagnating. It is not about exploiting personal data, it is about the cost of bureaucracy killing European startups in their infancy.

They intend to simplify compliance, not axe the law. And this is needed if Europe wants to make itself independent of USA and China on the tech front.

You who are against this, have you ever had to deal with GDPR? It is a nightmare and I am certain American big tech is secretly celebrating it, because it kills any European startup alternatives, because they cannot afford to employ enough people to be compliant with the law and if they try to do it with existing personnel they don’t have enough time left over to actually run their business.

If you have ever complained that there aren’t enough European alternatives, GDPR and other legislation is the reason why. USA shoots itself in the foot with tariffs and we Europeans shoot ourselves in the foot with regulations. I am just really glad the EU commission has realized this and are fixing it.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator