This is such a weird/creepy line to me (and maybe to some more germans).
There is a (now retired) german showmaster, Thomas Gottschalk, most famous for hosting “Wetten dass…?” for quite some years, who’s critzised for how he treats women. A few years ago in a popular talkshow, he literally and unironically said: “I only ever touched women on business.”
Such a creep and all around asshole.

Your assumption is correct.

After I thought I couldn’t care less about Star Wars anymore, I was recommended Maul - Shadow Lord and I only can forward this recommendation so far. It’s a well crafted crime show made in the gorgeous Star Wars animated series art style with an impressive titular character during the transitional period from Republic to Empire.

I mean, it’s still Star Trek. Star Trek has always been horny AF.

Asymmetrical clothing patterns done well are goated anyway.

Damn, Jake got the Sexy :3

I hope you had a backup of that transporter buffer, otherwise… Nope.

That’s the transporter technician who transferred from IT department.

Do klingons wear condoms like pants or like stockings?

Wasn’t this just posted very recently?

Edit: yes

Is that really how english speakers spell Rumpelstilzchen?

I feel like its not so much civilian-oversight that’s antagonized but greedy politicians.

Partly, yes. But for the most part, the ones in favour of civilian oversight were only greedy politicians, and that was used to frame the whole idea. Also the pure thought of civilian oversight was ridiculed by the protagonists without it being contextualized as a point of debate or something. Remember, there was a whole episode about why the US Air Force was best to control the Stargate program instead of an international comittee.

where Weir is not a politician- she’s a scientist

No, Weir was a diplomat, peace activist and expert on international politics, not a scientist. Also, her appearance in SG1 marked a slight change in the show’s characterization of civil oversight.

Kinsey is one of my biggest points in this issue. For several seasons, he was the only or leading figure arguing for civil oversight, and when you let only one or a most prominent character represent an idea that character is how the show frames that idea.

I respectfully disagree. I am currently in a rewatch, and there are two major issues I now have with SG1 (and don’t ask me why it didn’t bother/I didn’t notice before): how much civil oversight over the military is antagonized and how often events or explanations are recapped in dialogue.
In Atlantis, Weir and Woolsey are really respectable civil leaders with authority over the expedition’s military and the relationship between military and civil personnel is much more balanced (plus every now and then it leads to interesting conflict).
Also, this frequent summaries and retelling is often a point of critique for more modern shows (“modern shows get made for second screens”). That happens much less in Atlantis.

Some always were. Others that were founded by people who actually just wanted to have a great time on a festival turned them into temples of capitalism

I felt a different quote was the more fitting reference there: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/58822602

Also, I don’t know if the Genii are fascist. We don’tlearn a lot about them beyond being a military dictatorship posing as farmers.

Maybe you like this german shanty medley of football battle songs from a very punk football club then.

Everyone should be able to choose their own names. Because parents can screw up massively in that regard.

I’d wear this to Pride Parade. I really want this now.