• 2 Posts
  • 877 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 20th, 2023

help-circle






  • It mentions style as being among the data points used, along with personal details, though if your hidden account is used for things like whistleblowing or niche erotica, you may not be mentioning telltale biographical details at all often, while you can’t help writing the way you write, with numerous unconscious choices between alternative ways of phrasing things, which will be the bulk of what it has to work with.

    Of course, that doesn’t mean you couldn’t slip up, so if you don’t want your posts traced back to you, also look out for any details you’re leaking and file the serial numbers off them (and perhaps rig up a way of delaying your posts outside of your waking hours).



  • This seems to mostly scale up stylometry (the method of identifying authorship by writing style), a long-established technique. It unmasked the Unabomber in the 90s, as well as the anonymous author of a scandalous book about the Clinton administration. Indeed, one technique some writers use of dodging this is to deliberately write in character in a contrived style (there was an information-security poster on Twitter whose style was modelled on Taylor Swift, for example).

    As all things are an arms race, a countermeasure to this would be a locally-hosted language model that can rephrase text into a more neutral style. Install it on your phone, select the text you’ve written and get it to rewrite it, getting something without any regionalisms, turns of phrase or other peculiarities of your writing style that you wouldn’t notice but would identify you given a large enough corpus of your writings. A voice changer for text, if you will.





  • The US famously has a clear line of succession that goes down a long way, all the way to the Washington DC Municipal Dogcatcher or someone, and nominally is run by impartial institutions. Trump and his Supreme Court have weakened these somewhat, but they theoretically still stand, so that if a succession was triggered, there’d be considerable institutional inertia pushing to return to some form of equilibrium.

    Xi’s personal power over the CCP, and in turn, the Chinese state, seems to be a lot greater. There are no judges or delegates who would push back against him, and the principles of rule are what he says they are. It was similar with Mao, whose death precipitated conflict and instability.