• leds@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    5 days ago

    Fuck, some of that will be last remaining old growth, forever lost

    • parricc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      5 days ago

      That includes almost all remaining old growth forests. Almost all of the areas he chose are old growth forests. Here’s a map of all remaining old growth forests in the US for comparison.

      • spacesatan@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m guessing ‘old growth’ in this map means like 80 year forests or something. I’m extremely skeptical that this much forest was never logged.

        • parricc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          No. You’d be surprised. Old growth specifically means forests where the trees are older than 200 years on average. If you include mature forests, which are defined as 80-200 years old on average, the amount of forest becomes much larger. But also consider how much there used to be, and how much disappeared. The US was the first place in the world to really add forest protections. Theodore Roosevelt alone set aside over 150 million acres as national forests at the turn of the 20th century. We’re insanely lucky that happened. I’ve been lucky enough to have traveled to and seen national forests in almost every US state. It makes me die inside knowing they might get cut down now.