• inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think neopronouns would piss off those against the concept of non-binary or trans even more.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like the idea of inventing new pronouns, but most of the suggestions so far (like “Xe”) are too silly to be taken seriously. “They/them” can come off as impersonal at times, but we seem to be more or less settling on that, so whatever.

    • nifty@lemmy.worldBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But it shouldn’t though? In a reasonable society, using neopronouns isn’t any different than using someone’s name. Yeah, I acknowledge that society isn’t reasonable some times.

      • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Shouldn’t means nothing. People shouldn’t own other people and yet gestures broadly at history

        Calling someone what they want to be called is just being decent. Like your name is Thomas but you’d like to be called Tommy. Neopronouns aren’t names, they’re an attempt to force speech to fit the unique desires of the person demanding use of said neopronouns. Using they/them is a perfectly reasonable compromise.