PugJesus@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoBoth is goodlemmy.worldimagemessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down141
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageBoth is goodlemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.world to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-squareMouseKeyboard@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·3 months ago Plus, rural folks are not major emitters, so it doesn’t really make much sense to even try to find meaningful emission savings there. “On average, cities and large towns produce about four tonnes of CO2 per capita, compared with more than six tonnes elsewhere in the UK” https://www.centreforcities.org/reader/net-zero-decarbonising-the-city/why-cities-will-need-to-play-a-central-role-in-the-net-zero-agenda/
minus-square_NoName_@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·3 months agoThat is per capita my guy. They emit more per person, but when you’ve only got 5 families in 10 square miles, getting them to emit less is fuckall in comparison to everyone in a city emitting less.
“On average, cities and large towns produce about four tonnes of CO2 per capita, compared with more than six tonnes elsewhere in the UK”
https://www.centreforcities.org/reader/net-zero-decarbonising-the-city/why-cities-will-need-to-play-a-central-role-in-the-net-zero-agenda/
That is per capita my guy. They emit more per person, but when you’ve only got 5 families in 10 square miles, getting them to emit less is fuckall in comparison to everyone in a city emitting less.