Yes, I know that it still exist, and yes, decentralized currency which utilizes distributed, cryptographic validation is not actually a strictly bad idea, but…

Is the speculative investment scam, which crypto substantially represented, finally dead? Can we go back to buying gold bars and Pokemon cards?

I feel like it is, but I’m having a hard time putting my finger on why it lost its sheen. Maybe crypto scammers moved on to selling LLM “prompts?” Maybe the rug just got pulled enough times that everyone lost trust.

  • nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of controversial comments. Here are some of my observations:

    • Not a single mention of decentralised finance/DeFi in the comments, which is a game-changer.
    • A lot of outdated information or misunderstanding of recent developments in the industry
    • A large focus on scams and crypto bros, who are the loudest but definitely not the majority
    • fades@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Good points for sure.

      You mentioned recent developments, what Loopring is doing with Layer 2/3 technology has been game changing within the ethereum space. GameStop’s NFT marketplace, especially the games shines because of it.

      Semi-related, this post reminds me of a recent F1 story I came across on squabbles, where they are using w3 improve their ticketing systems to combat certain things that currently cause issues like scalping while also providing a medium for tailored ticket and fan experiences. It has actually been a long time coming, I found this article from ‘21 How Non-Fungible Tokens Are Coming To F1 which goes more in-depth with what their vision is and what they believe they can achieve.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if these kinds of applications pop up in other sports down the road if it does well for F1.

      Given all the negative press in addition to the unfortunate support from GOP fascists, from the outside looking in it must seem like it’s 90% delusional morons being taken advantage of by 10% scammer assholes.

      There are delusional morons and scammer assholes, but it’s a loud minority and does not define the technology and the assoc industry.

    • 0xpr03@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      DeFi

      All governments and API server owners have shown that this is a wish and not reality.

      • nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        DeFi has added some real value for both project creators and users, not just for myself. I’m not talking about the ‘money making, profit driven’ side of value either, but utility, capital efficiency, flexibility, new financial primitives as well.

        All sorts of crazy innovation that you shouldn’t just hand-wave away as a scam or redundant.

  • The Doctor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bitcoin’s in the low $29kus region lately (up from $26kus), so it looks like it’s going to keep going. Also, big real money investors are now pretty long on cryptocurrency, so there is a vested interest in keeping it around.

    Plus, you know, folks buying stuff on the black and grey markets with it. Wish I didn’t have to mention drugs, but it’s the easiest way to keep getting insulin for folks these days in addition to the usual recreational compounds.

  • Wander@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nope. I use it on a weekly basis to pay for stuff on the internet. It’s got its uses and the concept is sound. What you’re talking about is the hype train that happens ever so often.

    • Geo_bot@dataterm.digital
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m glad to see that paying for things is still an option. What I really hope for is that the future of crypto is all payments and the investors fuck off

      • Wander@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Servers, VPN, domain names and recurring donations. Mostly donations every week. Servers and VPN on a monthly basis.

        • SaintLunatic@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks for the response. Aside from the fed responses lol I was wondering what people actually used it for since we can’t deny there is a lack of products you can buy with crypto. I will def start using it for donations and VPN

          • Wander@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually I’ve had really good success in paying for privacy services with it. I wouldn’t do it any other way, especially for things like a VPN where you don’t want the provider to have to keep your name and address due to legal requirements.

            Another great use case is sending money abroad, especially to countries where there’s other sorts of financial restrictions.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Did you know if you ask me if I’m a cop that I legally have to answer you truthfully if I’m a cop? So relax! What do you spend it on?”

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It will never die. I believe it will wax and wane over the years. Being incredibly anonymous and deregulated means it will always be a great place for the evil doers to manipulate the market and make money off of it. Because of that there will always be some people using it.

    I think one of the biggest failings of cryptocurrency in general is that people view it as a replacement for cash or debit cards when in reality with how slow and expensive the transactions are it is more of a replacement for clearing houses. When you get money sent to your bank you can use it right away because the bank trusts you and provides that service but the money isn’t truly there yet. You may have heard the phrase of “the check cleared” or something similar. It takes a long time for those processes to complete and crypto is faster than it.

  • Weak hands got shaken out, and the economy is teetering on recession. When inflation stops and interest rates fall, and quantitative easing starts back up it’s gonna come roaring back. The SEC and CFTC aren’t trying to kill crypto, they are just trying to decide who’s jurisdiction it falls under. The crypto industry will benefit from regulation, it will get safer, and you’ll feel like an idiot for asking this question instead of buying while it’s cheap. Hit me up in 2025!

    • catboss@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am not sure if you are actually drinking the Kool-Aid or if this is some top tier shit posting. If it’s the latter, kudos to you!

      • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I find it odd people who want their social media decentralised but are disgusted when money is decentralised.

  • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is humming along nicely for those that use it. There could be another speculative pump filled with scams, that would be no surprise.

  • davehtaylor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago
    • As an actual currency, it’s functionally useless. Even if every retailer on the planet were to accept it, the overhead for making the transaction is just a non-starter

    • Because of that, it’s entirely just funny money. Even further, since it’s entirely a virtual asset, if the power goes out, your wallet goes with it

    • The environmental impacts are horrifying. This fact alone means that it should all be eradicated. Destroying the planet for Internet funny money isn’t an acceptable proposition

    • For a decentralized currency, people sure do love centralizing under large exchanges, and the massive losses, thefts, fraud, etc. have shown that no matter how “decentralized” it’s supposed to be, it’s still susceptible to the same bullshit as any other currency

    • Its high profile association with grifters, scammers, malware, and dark web shenanigans has completely soured its image in the public mind

    • It’s entirely a speculative investment scam now. There’s no way to decouple it from that.

    • Sodis@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some of these points are not inherent properties of cryptos, like the environmental impact and the transaction overhead.

    • Aetherion@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Funny how people are creating bullshit by taking about things they don’t know.

      Hint: Blockchain is more than just currency and when your centralised e-mail server is taken down with all of your e-mail’s, than you will think back at people who did the switch to decentralisation.

      Another hint: Ethereum did lower its CO2 emissions by 99%, just by changing its code. Can your 100% virtual currency, parked at your favorite bank in a country like sweden, where there is no cash anymore, do the same?

    • I have a few bitcoin that I got when it was new, and I was playing around with it; then I forgot about my coins until it exploded and made it into the public (non-tech) news. I luckily still had my wallet, and I bought a quite expensive watch with Bitcoin when it was near its price peak. The transaction was no more difficult than using Paypal. I could have bought a lot of things; at one point, I could have bought a car with it. There are many vendors who’ll accept Bitcoin even today. So, regardless of your other points, saying that it’s funny money that you can’t buy anything with is simply false. It’s worth what people will pay for it, just like the American dollar, or gold, or the artificially inflated price of blood diamonds.

      I don’t think promoting falsehoods helps any argument. If that one is obviously wrong, what about your other points? Lots of people want cryptocurrency to fail. Lots of people want to maintain the hegemony of the US dollar. Some people even have valid criticisms of proof-of-work cryptocurrencies, and the giant farming installations. It’s certainly something to discuss, as long as it’s kept to facts.

      • davehtaylor@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue with retail is how long it takes for a bitcoin transaction to be confirmed. The overhead simply isn’t feasible. A vendor isn’t going to sit around an wait an hour for confirmation that payment has been received. A private seller might not care. But a company that processes millions of transactions per day isn’t going to deal with that. It has nothing to do with the belief in it and its worth.

        And yes, let me be perfectly clear: I absolutely do want cryptocurrency to fail. That’s not about being a shill for government hegemony. It’s about there being literally no inherent good in it, either in principle or in practice. From the fact that it consumes more energy than entire countries and pumps more CO2 into the atmosphere than entire major industries, to the environmental impact of increased mining for rare earths, increased manufacturing strain, and supply chain disruption due to the demand for the chips to drive the miners.

        Also I really don’t appreciate your passive aggressive way of calling me a liar

        • Your position was clear.

          I’m not sure how else you’d prefer someone to call out untruths that you’ve posted. It’s either calling you a liar, or some version of saying you’re talking out your ass, or what not. But you’re right, that’s what I was saying. FWIW, I don’t think it’s lying the way Trump lies; I think there’s just a lot of uninformed knee-jerk reactionism. For example, you talk about processing times; have you ever heard of Lightning? It’s a crypto used a lot in Nostr and which has instant transfer times.

          My point is that I you’re arguing a point that is easily refuted, when you have other points that are reasonable and justifiable. I could argue against the other points, too; for example, I could bring up proof-of-stake crypto-currencies which do not have huge energy use, and which haveno more energy footprint than the SSL transactions that you’re using constantly, every day. But it would be a harder arguement for me to make because the original cryptocoin, Bitcoin, is proof-of-work and has had a huge eco impact.

          And I might not try to argue that unless I thought you were open to discussing the topic in good faith. Which I don’t believe you are; I think you’ve already made up your mind on the topic, and now all that’s left is evangelism.

          I do have a question, though: do you understand how blockchains work, and the what the various kinds of proofs are? Not in the “could you program it” sense, but in general, like could you describe how they work to someone over beer? Or have you just read a lot about how bad they are? How much of your opinion is based on your social media filter biases?

          • Dymonika@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s exactly what I was gonna say: @davehtaylor must have no idea of the nearly-cost-free Layer 2 network.

            Additionally, how much money does it take to power banks? All the staff, the electricity, the Brinks armored cars, the accounting for all that cash, the safety deposit boxes and all of their contents and insurance… Does he think ACH transfers or, worse, checks or money orders, are free on an environmental level? How is USD with all of its nonstop-growing debt safe in any long-term way?

    • liminis@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Correct me if I’m wrong, but since ETH moved to a proof of stake model rather than proof of work (i.e. “mining”), isn’t its environmental footprint now a fraction of the wasteful behemoth it was previously?

      (Though I 100% agree given the ‘gas fees’ (transaction costs), it’s still absolutely useless as an actual currency.)

      • xenos@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right about the environmental footprint - proof of stake dropped the energy consumption by 99.95%

        Ether (ETH) was never intended to serve as a digital currency. it was only meant to be the fuel or incentive for computational tasks on the Ethereum network. An L2 like Optimism or Arbitrum runs on top of Ethereum and facilitates transactions that are significantly faster (tens of thousands of transactions per second), for a fraction of the cost (pennies or fractions of pennies)

  • Ebuall@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe people understood, that instead of freedom as advertised, crypto brings out even more oppressive forms of capitalism.

  • dust4ngel@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    you can’t get a real discussion of crypto here because downvotes are impossible and the simps are legion

  • LootGoblin42@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. Bitcoin is the future of money. It really is the best form of money humanity has invented so far. People just need to stop trading shit coins.

    • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No fucking way haha, imagine having to hang out at the grocery store for an hour waiting for your payment to clear

    • Schooner@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah man, keep huffing that copium.

      Bitcoin has no long term plan for actually securing its chain. The fees don’t add up to enough and the throughput is abysmal. Lightning is centralised and was disrupted because of chain congestion due to Ordinals.

      Keep dreaming!

    • knokelmaat@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bitcoin (as it uses proof of work) is incapable of handling all transaction of the world without creating insane amounts of wasted energy.

      Updating the ledger (actually writing down transactions) is only a fraction of the total computing resources it consumes. Most of it is just spent doing random hashes over and over again (the proof of work part). This is computing power that does not actually do any of the money related tasks, it’s just there to keep the ledger trusted.

      This is an awesome idea in theory, but completely unscalable in reality.

      Other Blockchain technologies like proof of stake don’t have this issue of energy waste, but they have other hurdles.

      But Bitcoin as it is implemented now can never be the money of the future in my opinion.

      • lightrush@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Trust is one of the most fundamental parts of any monetary system, so brute forcing hashes in this case is directly related to it.

        Bitcoin can easily serve the world on 100 Mac Minis. Probably even fewer. The fact that currently people beat themselves into burning ridiculous amounts of electricity to run Bitcoin nodes is a function of the profitability of doing that. If that profitability decreases, so will the electricity burned. If I remember correctly, the protocol is designed to reduce that reward over time and unless the dollar value of Bitcoin dramatically increases, the energy waste should decrease long term.

        A secondary point on energy consumption is how that of Bitcoin compares to the traditional financial transaction systems. I don’t have the numbers at the moment but last time I checked it wasn’t pretty for the latter.

        With all that said, if PoS is proven to be as robust as PoW, it would probably be adopted by systems currently on PoW, like Bitcoin.

        • xthexder@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you’re missing a critical part of how blockchains function: If Bitcoin was running on only 100 Mac Minis, there is nothing stopping someone buying 101 more Mac Minis, becoming dominant in the network and suddenly they can decide to just print their own bitcoins for themself.

          The profitability of running Bitcoin miners is proportional to the market cap and the value of Bitcoin itself. For Bitcoin to remain stable, the total value must remain less than the cost of hardware to dominate the consensus algorithm.

            • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Bitcoin miners validate transactions on the network, so if one entity controls a majority of all miners, they can validate their own fraudulent transactions

    • goatmeal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      bitcoin will never be the dominant global currency. it couldn’t even maintain its position as the dominant darknet currency. bitcoin is not perfect and you are part of a religious cult that bans people for pointing out its shortcomings.

  • worfamerryman@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the US each time crypto is traded it needs to be reported.

    I got free crypto from Coinbase. Then sent it to a wallet, then sold it. So each transaction needed to be reported. It’s too troublesome to be worth it.

    Also, if I buy crypto, they have a week hold before I can move it. My idea was to buy crypto in country A and sell it in country B to quickly transfer money between the two countries I live in. Also it would help me beat the bank fees.

    But the 7 day hold kinda defeats the purpose of quickly transferring money.