TNG s5e2 " Darmok"

  • Tango@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    The Tamarian language is like C++ whilst normal language is binary, or assembly. Sure, all C++ is based on assembly and assembly is based on binary, but once you’ve invented a higher-level language, you’re not gonna have much patience for lower-level languages anymore; that’s for the compiler to worry about. You might still use binary - or, more realistically, hexadecimal - for limited purposes like RGB codes, but outside of that it’s all higher-level, baby.

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      We can learn C++ without without knowing binary because we have C++ documentation written in human languages. Likewise, the Tamarians need a non-metaphorical language to explain their metaphors.

      • Tango@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        They have it. “Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra” contains the words “and” and “at”. Other phrases include words like “his”, “eyes”, “opened”, “when”, “the”, “walls”, “fell”, “on”, “ocean”, etc. That’s the binary. What’s interesting is that they seem incapable of understanding binary on its own anymore, and only know C++.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          It’s easy to forget, there is a universal translator in between that is at the root of the misunderstanding. This isn’t really a higher level language coming up against a lower one. It’s a compiler coming across syntax it wasn’t designed for.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      A C++ user could never make novel assembly that C++ couldn’t already target without also being able to deal in assembly.

      So your concept may explain all the speaking in only old metaphors, but in the end they synthesize a new one: Picard and Dathon at El-Adrel. So they clearly could still use the underlying languag.

      Also, Dathon listened to Picard tell a story, and Dathon seemed engaged with language as a narrative. This means Dathon was able to grasp the story as constructed from words he ostensibly wouldn’t have understood?

      • Tango@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Well, it’s important to remember that Picard wasn’t the only one there trying to figure the other guy out. Dathon was trying, too. So it’s like a C++ user spending enough time observing an assembly coder that he was able to invent ONE novel C++ command.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          But Dathon didn’t make it out alive, so whatever understanding he gained died with him.