• DagwoodIII@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          1 month ago

          So, if you personally were going into combat, you’d be happy to have the 1700s single shot musket instead of a modern weapon?

          Next you’ll be saying that two tin cans connected by a string is as good as a modern landline.

              • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 month ago

                You’re the one who seems confused that not working for a corporation doesn’t make doing violence for payment less professional or mercenary…

                • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I don’t know who you think you’re replying to.

                  I’m commenting to Miller.

                  His take is that a weapon is a weapon, mine is that there’s a lot of difference between a spear and a tank.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Do you have first hand knowledge of the work these mercenaries do versus the work of western mercenaries? Your entire argument is premised upon having said knowledge.

        • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think you replied to the wrong commenter.

          I’m having a beef with Miller about how the meaning of the word mercenary has changed over time.

  • الله@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    TLDR: terrorism as a service. A new form of terrorism in Western countries: “disposable terrorists.” Instead of trained ideological extremists, hostile states and proxy groups recruit ordinary people online for money to carry out attacks, sabotage, or intimidation. Using encrypted apps, cryptocurrency, and criminal networks, organizers can quickly hire low-skill operatives who are easy to replace and difficult to trace. The article links this trend to Iran-backed networks and describes it as part of modern “hybrid warfare,” combining espionage, cyber tactics, propaganda, and deniable violence.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    “One big question is whether it still makes sense to talk about radicalisation of a perpetrator if they are just interested in getting paid,” said Neumann.”

    I would argue they are still radicalized, just by capitalism. People doing anything for money is not natural really, nor healthy.

  • Gust@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    > creates conditions that cause millions of people to be economically desperate, lacking access to basic human needs

    > some economically desperate people turn to increasingly violent crime as a way to make ends meet

    > shockedpikachu.jpg

    • Chais@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh come on, you can’t expect these people to think further than one quarter ahead. That’s all they ever learned and needed.

  • robomuffin79@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Every country operates similar systems. The Israelis have the perfect one - honey trap operators like Epstein and Mossad assassins using fake foreign passports

  • TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Once, a hostile secret service had to send a skilled and experienced operative to commit assassination, sabotage or terrorism thousands of miles away, or activate networks of sleeper agents, or find and train ideologically committed recruits ready to betray their country. Such schemes took years to prepare.

    Nope. This is not how spy work works. Want you want is a bunch of turned deniable assets. The skill operative is an invention of the American movies

  • one_step_behind@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is not a new menace, nor is it just Western countries who are dealing with it.

    Mercenaries have been around forever and everyone is using them. I would say that the entire continent of Africa has been menaced far more than ‘Western’ countries.