There’s enough going on inside to raise questions about what we consider thinking - but it’s crystal clear this shape of model is not self-aware. You can swap some names and it’ll hold your side of the argument without missing a beat.
From the other direction, we have to acknowledge that people can also make up reasons for something they did on autopilot. Yes, sometimes you are describing a conscious process. Other times you did a thing, someone asks what the fuck, and your brain constructs a plausible motive after-the-fact.
Dumb as these models are, we shouldn’t oversimplify. They’re smart enough that we can call them stupid. They have a measurable IQ. If that’s possible with just dice rolls, what does that say about meatbags like us?
There’s enough going on inside to raise questions about what we consider thinking - but it’s crystal clear this shape of model is not self-aware. You can swap some names and it’ll hold your side of the argument without missing a beat.
From the other direction, we have to acknowledge that people can also make up reasons for something they did on autopilot. Yes, sometimes you are describing a conscious process. Other times you did a thing, someone asks what the fuck, and your brain constructs a plausible motive after-the-fact.
Dumb as these models are, we shouldn’t oversimplify. They’re smart enough that we can call them stupid. They have a measurable IQ. If that’s possible with just dice rolls, what does that say about meatbags like us?