Though the Windows thing was really funny 😂.

  • bort@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    8 months ago

    the linux-file-deletion is used as a example for good software design. It has a very simple interface with little room for error while doing exactly what the caller intended.

    In John Ousterhout’s “software design philosophy” a chapter is called “define errors out of existence”. In windows “delete” is defined as “the file is gone from the HDD”. So it must wait for all processes to release that file. In Linux “unlink” is defined as “the file can’t be accessed anymore”. So the file is gone from the filesystem immediately and existing file-handles from other processes will life on.

    The trade-off here is: “more errors for the caller of delete” vs “more errors due to filehandles to dead files”. And as it turns out, the former creates issues for both developers and for users, while the later creates virtually no errors in practice.

  • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I like the windows delete philosophy of asking me before I delete something.

    I fucking hate the windows delete philosophy of telling me I don’t have access after I said yes.

    I’m this close to daily driving as Sadmin

  • Koof_on_the_Roof@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    8 months ago

    One drive has a trash for the trash. I’m still not convinced those files are gone after the 2nd empty, I think they just don’t show the other trash cans

    • Ziglin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      They usually support one but it is generally not provided by the file manager it’s self. This means that assuming that the file managers use the same trash system you can trash a file on one recover it another.

  • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    8 months ago

    The windows shell has really gone downhill in recent years, with spontaneous file locks and random hangs

    It’s always the AV…

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’m so annoyed when I tell rm to delete a terabyte of data and it’s nowhere near instant. I’d have probably gone insane if I was using Windows.

    • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      1TB for Windows… depends on file size, but let’s presume you have 1TB of Word documents… just hit Enter and go watch the Matrix trilogy.

    • Andrew@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Akchooly, what you’re referring to as terabyte (TB) is called tebibyte (TiB), because window$ suck and JADEC made everyone believe that binary units are metric units, which is stupid. But we have the savior IEC which KDE is using in all of their software and I respect that.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 months ago

    Left side: I regularly go bowling with the demon core

    Right side: I have read the demon core’s wiki 314 times

      • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        With great power comes great responsibility. Do check twice what you write.

        Jokes aside, it has happened to almost everyone… and then you learn to QUADRUPLE CHECK dd commands.

        • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          I haven’t accidentally deleted a bunch of data yet (which, considering 99% of my interaction with Linux is when I’m SSH’d into a user’s server, I am very paranoid about not doing), but I have run fsck on a volume without mounting the read/write flashcache with dirty blocks on it first.

          Oops.

          • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It will happen to you sooner or later 😂… we’re all dead on a long enough time scale 🤷 😂.

    • Pete90@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I did, and it was fast. I was a complete noob, so I thought rm -rf /* would delete everything in the current folder. I hit Ctrl + C, but it was too late. Took a few seconds to wipe out the whole system.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Now wonder, which one is will be preferred by people who aren’t tech savvy.

    • porl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      They are not likely to be using the terminal. Pretty much every graphical file browser will ask for confirmation upon delete, and many will use a rubbish bin by default.

    • Ziglin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      To be fair, assuming you are not using a wastebasket which comes pre installed in a lot of distros, you still need the right permissions to delete files that belong to the system and if you’re using rm you have to use the -rf option to remove a folder and it’s contents.

    • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, but get this! It’s not enough to just envoke cmd in Windows with just Win+R (sorry, sorry… Super+R 😁), even though you’re invoking it from an admin account, no sir, it’s still just a plain user as long as cmd is concerned 😂.

      And this is what you get when you wanna do backwards compatibility all the way down to DOS 😂.

      • Ziglin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        We have pretty good backwards compatibility too, to my knowledge it’s actually better.

        • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          My point was, MS has backwards compatibility all the way down to an OS that has no sense of users and permissions and that is why Windows, even nowadays, has these problems. If you get rid of the DOS legacy stuff, you can have decent user permission and security in place, but too much shit relies on legacy code, so they keep it.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    One of my first experiences with Linux at university was watching a classmate install Slackware, and then (for a laugh) dragging everything into the recycle bin.

    They got a passing grade, because the lecturer saw their working installation, but they learned a valuable lesson in Linux that if you delete something, it’ll fucking delete it.