• towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Huh.
    So the UK has previously failed to block encryption. And somehow the Online Safety Act got pushed through to PrOtEcT ThE ChiLDrEn - requiring age verification for all adult content.
    Resulting in a study by ministers on how VPNs stop OfCom from enforcing the OSA.
    Which is a thing VPNs do. So it’s very likely VPNs get de-anonymised, regulated or outlawed.

    Seems like there is a war on the actual internet, owning device and services.

    Why don’t they licence IP addresses? Require a change to IPv6 and just assign everyone a IPv6/48 block at birth. That means there are 281 billion birth assignments available, with everyone getting septillions of personal addresses - actually more than you could provision in a vibe coded k8s manifest.

    If there are 200 million births per year (it’s apparently 135 million atm), thats well over 1000 years before we run out of IPv6/48 blocks (1400 years, to be slightly more accurate. At a constant 135m births per year, thats 2000 years. But conservatively, 1000 years before we reuse IPv6/48 blocks… If we don’t reduce the block size to represent year born or something)

    Fuck.
    The good internet is gone. The convenient internet is fading fast.

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Heh, I allocated a ipv6 cidr to a dev to use for ha testing. He created 1 /48 subnet then came back and asked for another 3. Sigh.

  • 4am@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Wait until they find out that HTTPS traffic is encrypted

    • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Don’t be naive and think they can’t block this stuff because of encryption. They just go after the business entities. Eventually you’ll only be left with super sketchy options that they’ll try to block by IP.

      They probably won’t totally succeed, but they can make things far shitter than they are.

    • subversive_dev@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      A middlebox can’t see the actual content but they know what sites you are visiting and how often if you are only using HTTPS - meaning they can also block you from accessing sites of their choosing

  • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Porn for me but not for thee.

    Ironic that the party of fucking pedophiles wants to block pornography because it’s indecent. But raping little children is OK by them so long as you’re sufficiently rich and well-connected enough to avoid any consequences.

    • alekwithak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s just like the oversexualization of our natural forms. By taking away something that leaves those who have it with a commodity to sell.

  • RipLemmDotEE@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    That’s one hell of a misleading headline. It should read ”Michigan Republicans Introduced a Bill…”

    • lukaro@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If it’s something shitty that the government is doing you can be assured, it’s a republican.

      • Scoopta@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Except in the UK where the government is on the left. This seems to be one situation where both the right and the left are universally looking to screw over their citizens and there has to be some way we can stop it.

  • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    12 hours ago

    How do they plan to ban VPNs? Not on the legal side - they’ll just say they’re banned.

    But in the real world, I can disguise my packets to not look like VPN packets, and I can also use many different types of obfuscation to ensure my activity stays private.

    So my question is: where are the epstein files?

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Michigan’s bill would charge internet service providers with detecting and blocking VPN use, as well as banning the sale of VPNs in the state.

      Sounds like they are basically planning to tell ISPs to just figure it out, and suing VPN companies that don’t block people from their state.

  • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    13 hours ago

    A proposed bill in Michigan has a broad reach that covers everything from adult AI content to manga and even depictions of transgender people. It includes a VPN ban to avoid workarounds.

    On Sept. 11, Michigan Republican representatives proposed far-reaching legislation banning adult internet content.

    The bill, called the Anticorruption of Public Morals Act and advanced by six Republican representatives, would ban a wide variety of adult content online, ranging from ASMR and adult manga to AI content and any depiction of transgender people. It also seeks to ban all use of VPNs, foreign or US-produced.

    The Anticorruption of Public Morals Act has not passed the Michigan House of Representatives committee nor been voted on by the Michigan Senate, and it’s not clear how much support the bill currently has beyond the six Republican representatives who have proposed it.

    TL;DR: 6 Republicans in Michigan proposed a bill that won’t pass, as the Senate and Governor are Democrats.

    • Hector@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not a chance this would pass. This is virtue signaling, or what is the opposite of virtue in government oppression.

      Faschignalling. But a lot of other shitholy States have passed these kind of laws, like Montana and Texas.

    • balrog@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Even if the entire state government were Republican, it wouldn’t pass. This bill is basically the definition of governmental virtue signaling

      Businesses require VPNs to function. Banning them would decimate Michigan’s economy. The only thing these people truly value is money

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Any law that contains the word “morals” or “morality” in the title terrifies me. They 100% of the time are a net negative for society.

      • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Especially when morals vary and are just someone’s opinion. Morals should only be involved when it’s based on the most popular opinion. Moral laws should 100% be voted on by the people not just some old people that are out of touch with society.

      • banazir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Hey now, you can’t say that, read the bill:

        Is a depiction, description, or simulation, whether real, animated, digitally generated, written, or auditory, of sexual acts, that includes any of the following:

        (I) Vaginal or anal intercourse

  • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    But don’t you dare tell an American to rise up against this. They are so busy campaigning the next election, they don’t have the time and finance to insurrect.

    So enjoy your Syrian internet.

    • feddylemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This is for Michigan and it will not pass. No wonder I have you tagged as a knee jerk flame fueler.

      • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Let me get your praxis correct: you label folks in lemmy, instead of holding these Michigan Fascists accountable. How should I react?

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Let me get your praxis correct: Michigan is the United States? As in everyone currently living in the U.S. is actually from Michigan?

          Because that’s what you’re implying. I think I’m also going to tag you as knee jerk flame fueler.

          • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            7 hours ago

            If fascists can make trips to blue states to enforce their “crackdowns,” why aren’t Michigans taking Nazis out to a great lake?

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Michigander or Michiginian, and boy do I wonder why that isn’t happening.

              Mind giving me a ballpark of where you live? I’m sure I can tailor an answer specifically for you.

              Edit: Answer my question.

                • Jax@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Ok, what are you doing about the gerontocracy strangling your society?

                  What are you doing about the Chinese fishing your waters to death?

                  Beyond all of that — are you taking the same steps you’re advocating to United States citizens?

                  People are overwhelmed with money problems, scared of losing their jobs, scared of going to jail. There a multitude of reasons why they simply can’t drop what they’re doing and make the journey to Michigan. We are talking about ordinary every day people go against a trillion dollar propaganda/war machine — what would you ask of them?

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          If you’re not from a given Congressman’s district, you usually can’t even fill out a form on their website.

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Reading the bill, it’s pretty insane. I’m not a lawyer, but it seems to ban pretty much all sexual content and all depictions of cross dressing, along with proxies and VPNs. I’m pretty sure you couldn’t show Monty Python, because they occasionally cross dress in their sketches.

    Anticorruption of Public Morals Act. The name alone screams overreach.

  • Epzillon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Literal China surveillance state bill. How the fuck do I keep reading shit like this every day. What even is the US?

    • Erasmus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s becoming a mirror of the Middle East, not China.

      They want the same type of Sharia like morality controls over the populace just in a ‘Christian Nationalism’ wrapper.