That’s not how free speech works.
That’s not how free speech works.
There tons of actions that are legal but are morally reprehensible
Of course. The problem is that morality is subjective, which is why we have laws instead of anyone being allowed to kill whomever they consider morally reprehensible.
It’s murder if it’s against the law. If you think whatever the CEO did should be against the law, maybe you should work on that instead.
Because most people on Lemmy secretly (or not secretly) wish they could murder everyone who doesn’t share their politics and are projecting this on other people.
Use it and love it, sure. But benefit from it?
I feel bad for you. The imaginary world you live in must be really terrifying.
What the fuck? Why does such a thing exist?
I’ll walk into a park full of stoners, grab their attention and teleport home.
It’s sad that you prioritize “velocity” over user experience.
I’m not talking about blocking, but about being unable to see all replies to a post unless you open it on its home instance, which happens all the time on Mastodon.
And you know how, when you subscribe to a mailing list, you will only receive new mail sent to the list if your server happens to “federate” with the sender’s server?
Oh wait, that’s not how e-mail works.
Did you not look at the car before buying it?
Wait what? There are countries where you can drive without headlights?
Nim? D? Ada?
Who would’ve guessed that a tree is the best way to visualize something that can be arbitrarily nested?
I’m sorry, the platform that allows you to use a custom domain as your identity has “no account portability”, as opposed to the one where you have to manually copy over almost everything?
ChromeOS user.
I don’t think I’ve ever received an e-mail from an Apple Mail address.
Let me see how you get instance admins to agree on what to defederate.
Free speech is about protecting opinions and beliefs. A threat is not an opinion.