seems like a dev toolkit that other people can use with their own things for watermarking i doubt they would actually add it to google search. The majority of people who use google would immediately use it to circumvent them trying to push ai into everything which would not benefit them financially.

oh im about to add that to ublock ty

havent seen a search engine that flags ai generated results. This would be hard to implement there’s no technology (AI or otherwise) that can accurately guess if something was generated by large language models. They can do it manually since a person can sometimes tell just by looking (images, their cadence etc…) but this involves labor and costs money. The other option would require web pages to say something like “this was/wasn’t artificially generated” and they report that. At the moment its financially beneficial to not say if you use AI. When the bubble bursts people will sour on the idea (more so than they do now) and they’ll have an incentive to disclose when they do/don’t use it. It would become the new green washing. In the next couple of years “AI” will need a rebrand.

librewolf, mullwad browser

<ivy-league-school> dropout needs to become a slur

yearly tradition at this point

you know what I’m gonna try this lmao couldn’t possibly hurt at this point

I know 😔 I thought maybe I’d just try I’ve always been told to ask

again?

We previously reported on how Andrew Frame, the founder of Citizen, used the app to put a $30,000 bounty on an alleged arsonist’s head during the 2021 Palisades, Los Angeles fires. It was the wrong person and they were innocent. At one point during that event, Citizen’s head of community Prince Mapp said “We have mobilized a city to bring one person to justice.”

what the fuck

they’ve said multiple times that they require email as a way to combat against their work being scrapped by bots and getting published elsewhere. They are a small team doing great work they need money to keep running. I don’t see what the issue is.