'murican republican party is trying to criminalize immigrants, LGBT youth, and pro palatinian speech; I have yet to see a car discriminate who it maimes or kills. IIRC there are plans for California to make new ICE cars illegal in 2035. and yes the us does have a bit of a gun problem.
people destroy the environment, cars need people to cause significant environmental harm. If you just reduce the commonality (people) there will be less environmental harm, fewer deaths, and fewer cities pushing their employment heavy ideals on the rest of the country.
one trys to criminalize my friends, the other provides a more reliable form of transportation to the big airport than the smaller airlines and results in fewer deaths than firearms in my country.
yes, but what if you don’t want mercy?
how much tax is there on train ownership overthere?
no, other types of hatred are allowed and plentiful
it would work pretty well after a few years, just ignore the deaths during the roll out.
sawdust is edible though, now digestable is a different question entirely and will require a few centuries of research to get data on due to my pro-sawdust-in-food lobbyists.
yes, however as far as I am aware there are no laws in the us against any private vehicle usage on private land. Unlike the FDA which criminalizes owning or consuming certain chemicals.
this is probably a place that associates “borg” with the “resistance is futile” quote more than anything else
if I was better at Geoguesser I might try to figure out which part of the greater pheonix area this picture is from
I don’t think everyone agrees on what it’s supposed to even mean. if you want no mercy to be given to you should that mean that you shouldn’t give others mercy?
where I am (Alaska) this is mostly used around buisness everyone hates and where there are a lot of walkers to prevent lawsuits; as for snowplows and critical roads, just use giant snowblowers and accept the need to repair the road annually.
it can save money over labor and increased road maintenance of snow plows, it also makes it significantly less of a trip hazard because ice patches get removed faster.
sounds like large populations are the problem for cars, not cars being inherently a problem.
similarly looking for sip companies, specifically with less discrimination against the 49th state.
pretty sure that mostly applies to mega cities that shouldn’t have multi-lane roads to begin with
fithy corps coluding with the feds
but it will make them less celabete
does Britain not allow car deterrent I beams?