Prove that for any q rational number greater than one and for any perfect square q there exists a natural number n that is not equal to zero so that s+q*n is a perfect square

@flexbot Miisha prove that, by repeatedly adding a rational number that is greater than one to a perfect square, you will always get an infinite amount of perfect squares

I have seen people who are both so this doesnt eliminate the possibility

I bet you think the obstacle coursers defeat the nanoscientist

Isnt using machine learning as bad? LLMs dont include image, sound, animation generation as far as i know

Generative AI or genAI seems like the best term to use

Elon Musk did say they are not cis

Internalized transphobia must be really strong for them

How is that not illegal already?

Can you just pubicly impersonate someone?

Kinda unrelated, but i hate how there are so many things with the name proton. Also doesnt help how easy i can misremember photon as proton

The article warns that passkeys could be used, assuming they become the only form of logging into platforms, to prevent someone using the wrong operating system to log into those platforms.

Being prevented from using certain applications because you use the wrong OS is nothing new, but there is, from everything i have seen, always a reason to block it, they dont do it for someone elses benefit. A lot of banking apps cannot be used on many android roms; without microg or gapps many android apps wont work (some wont work even with microg); games sometimes use kernel-level anticheat that forces players to use windows; people solved this issue by just not using those apps

Why would a significant portion of used websites/applications that require accounts stop allowing passwords or authenticator apps, relying on this open standard, force certain options to be used for the standard and ensure that the user isnt on an operating system they have no reason to care about. There are already methods to prevent people from using a certain OS, they could just not rely on an open standard

This person assumes the best case for DHHs statements and excuses things by mentioning lack of information, but does not do the same for the person they are arguing against

This can of course be explained by them not realizing that, but that would mean that both the original post and this one are not thought out enough

Therapy, switching to linux, taking steps to transition, coming out to a friend irl

In that order

Have you watched the video before trying to argue against the title?

If potatoes disappeared, i would probably just not eat potatoes. May need to eat more bread because of it, from 94.3% of all food i eat to 94.6% of all food i eat

Open source projects that allow those humans to contribute can also demoralize some developers and get a lot of people to dislike and not use the project

Allowing the use of something that is ruining the internet, mental health, the environment, art, politics etc. may demoralize some developers and get a lot of people to dislike and not use your project, something that is way more important for a social media than the speed LLMs allegedly provide

I have blocked a single person

I can still see their comments for some reason

Blender is one of the best 2d animation software according to a lot of people

The game engine got forked

Using plugins, you can make an entire game with both 2d animated sprites and 3d models, sound obviously, a trailer, all without leaving the app. You can even take notes

If at this point every major codebase is using AI for development, and AI is unavoidable, might as well embrace it on your own terms.

Why? People use linux even though windows seems unavoidable, people use privacy respecting messaging services when everyone says to contact them on whatsapp, so many people use reddit, barely anybody uses lemmy

If you cant completely avoid something, should you just give up on trying at all?

Why are people giving something that is ruining the internet, politics, learning, the environment, jobs, art, mental health so much leniency