Like AI or not, Linux has a distinct advantage over Windows as an Ai first style operating system. In Linux almost everything can be done through the terminal, making it much easier to be used with AI.

Making Windows an Ai operating system means partially that the Ai has to take screenshots and directly control the mouse, very ineffective.

Interesting twist if nothing else.

Fast mass generated stuff luckily tends to be easier to identify, than the stuff made using well prompted and thoughtful techniques. So yes, slop might remain identifiable for a while now.

Learning to identify AI made content is currently possible in some cases, and as things are, we’re fast approaching the situation when it won’t be possible in most cases. I don’t think we can adapt this in that way.

AI assistance in coding or accessibility is not enshittification.

Isn’t like most development partially AI these days? Even Linux development. If the platform itself isn’t going AI, I don’t really see an issue here.

I don’t really think a blanket prohibition on anything AI related is useful. This doesn’t really ring like anything problematic.

This sounds completely benign. Jumping ship for stuff like this is absurd.

Couldn’t really find what they are doing with AI. There are acceptable uses so, would prefer to know before going either way.