

Surely its not the same cast.
A new group of kids having adventures would appeal to me more. I don’t even want cameos from the OG Goonies, that kind of shit make legacy sequals feel much too bloated.
Surely its not the same cast.
A new group of kids having adventures would appeal to me more. I don’t even want cameos from the OG Goonies, that kind of shit make legacy sequals feel much too bloated.
That doesn’t sound good.
Shouldn’t they know what kind of films they want to make before they start rolling on part 1.
This claims a $4404 box office?
https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Truth-About-Emanuel-The
For film I thought “box office gross” was the amount paid for tickets at the cinema. Is the article using a different definition of “gross”?
On Tuesday, the company said ad-supported plans in Q4 accounted for over 55% of sign-ups in its ads countries and membership on the ads plan grew nearly 30% quarter over quarter.
I’m surprised to hear this plan represents half of new subscriptions. Its probably just that most people willing to pay for full plans were already subscribed but its still surprising.
I think she is taking a wise position there.
Her involvement is probably enough to get a project green lit but without Jim Carrey it would feel like a Son of Mask level cash grab.
Misleading headline, its a parking fine not dangerous driving or an unroadworthy vehicle or similar.
Yeah, and it looks like they tried to sue then too but missed a deadline.
Below, see a breakdown of story elements that are present both in the Moana movies and the Bucky screenplay:
- The setting of an ancient Polynesian village
- A teenager goes on an ocean adventure that involves the spirits of ancestors manifesting as animals
- Said adventure begins because of a turtle
- A symbolic necklace is important to the story
- A supporting character is a hook-wielding demigod with tattoos
- A large creature is hidden in a mountain
- The crew is sucked into a whirlpool portal
It shows how much brand recognition drives the industry at that level (top 10s).
I’m not helping, reflecting on last year we saw the following in cinemas:
Not a new IP in the list.
Yeah, its the “most anticipated” list so it really just measuring brand recognition.
1 month exclusivity for cinemas?
I would be happy to pass on his entire catalog but Galaxy Quest is pretty cool and he wouldn’t have landed that role without being an established leading actor.
If I am remembering correctly the creator was working on Peppa Pig and decided to go back home and design an Australian cartoon with a similar model.
Obviously its no guarantee of Bluey’s success but it looks like Peppa has been running since 2004.
Is long as they don’t include too many references to the fad of the moment (e.g.flossing) they can be evergreen as new kids age into the target demographic.
My son was two when Bluey started and while he has aged of following it closely he still checks out the new episodes two or three times a year with a sense of nostalgia.
Joe Brumm, who created “Bluey,” is writing and directing the film.
This is the only real detail that isn’t already in the headline
Does it need to be at movie scale?
A 30min workplace sitcom about running the whitehouse in that world might work.
Yes, yes this is.
The comedian was recently asked by ComicBook.com about making a sequel to “The Mask,” his 2004 comedy that introduced the world to Cameron Diaz and became a blockbuster with $351 million at the worldwide box office. That number made “The Mask” the fourth highest-grossing film of 2024.
Their list:
12) The Land Before Time
11) Wolf Children
10) The Iron Giant
9) Superman: Doomsday
8) Hotel Transylvania
7) Rango
6) The Pagemaster
5) Sword of the Stranger
4) Batman: Under the Red Hood
3) Ice Age: The Meltdown
2) The Hobbit
1) The Flight of Dragons
But of course the correct top 3 is:
3) The Pirates! In an Adventure with Scientists!
2) Coraline
1) The Secret of NIMH
I actually didn’t mind the Beetlejuice sequal, it was busy but fun. So I guess it comes down to implementation more than hard rules.
But Jurassic World 3 would have been better served being split into two films, one where they visit the Jurassic Park crew for some guidance and a separate film where the Jurassic World crew can resolve their own issues and complete their series.
Pushing both into a single 147 minute movie is a bit silly.
I have no problem with sequals taking an idea/world and not the characters from the original. Star Trek has been doing this pretty successfully with their TV shows for years.