I may not be able to carry you through the Internet but I can certainly praise how nice your ass is, Miisha :p
- 1 Post
- 122 Comments
I’m Hinata Hyuuga. Could be worse I guess.
Hexarei@beehaw.orgto
Programming@programming.dev•Copyrightability of LLM-generated code: Can we license “vibe code” into Free Software?
1·27 days agoSo self hosted inference means you own it then?
Hexarei@beehaw.orgto
Programming@programming.dev•Recommendations for opensource Jetbrains equivalents?
1·2 months agoI moved to neovim several years ago and haven’t looked back. Sounds like I got out at the right time
Hexarei@beehaw.orgto
Privacy@programming.dev•Is Google Gemini trained on Google docs? One indie developer thinks so, after it told players about his unreleased game plans
3·2 months agoModel training takes a long time
Disappointing trigger discipline
Hexarei@beehaw.orgto
Programming@programming.dev•Retry is not a loop, its a data structure
3·3 months agoThey call that a Ralph loop
Hexarei@beehaw.orgto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•How to follow comic series?English
1·3 months agoAlso mentioning Suwayomi, a web server implementation of tachi
With your bridging to discord, do you have dm capabilities? Able to join servers you don’t control? Because I’m nervous about the idea of getting banned for puppeting since I have multiple big servers I’m in charge of
I just use it in a browser honestly
Hexarei@beehaw.orgto
196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•I try not to date people hotter than me for this reasonEnglish
3·3 months agoAs the smaller of two wives, you are correct
Hexarei@beehaw.orgto
Programming@programming.dev•Open source is a thankless job and I think we've lost the plot on how we treat maintainers
1·3 months agoI may have been hyperbolic, but my point is that the dichotomy is between:
- Any obligations
- No obligations
FOSS maintainers have no obligations at all. Moral or otherwise.
Hexarei@beehaw.orgto
Programming@programming.dev•Open source is a thankless job and I think we've lost the plot on how we treat maintainers
1·3 months agoWhat arbitrary line of popularity suddenly requires me to support every use-case, by never breaking something in a project nobody is paying me to build?
10 people? 100? 100,000?
The answer is: none because the premise is false.
FOSS maintainers owe you NOTHING. Nada. Zip. That includes a working copy of the software, and you agreed to that stipulation in the license. That’s what “no warranty of fitness any purpose” means.
That includes not owing you any specific method of project “governance” or versioning scheme, it includes not owing you releases, ever.
Also, what counts as “dicking over” a user? That sounds arbitrary too.
- Refusing to answer their questions?
- Removing a feature they liked because it was a nightmare to maintain?
- Leaving a bug in place because trying to fix it sounds unfun?
- Introducing a bug because you didn’t realize there was an interaction between two features?
- Deciding that tests are no fun, and deleting all of them, increasing the likelihood of bugs?
- Deciding that documentation is out of date, too much of a pain to keep updating, and removing it wholesale to avoid confusion because it’s inaccurate anyway?
FOSS maintainers have no obligations to you. None. No arbitrary line of popularity changes that.
I build my open source projects for fun and for free. Your decision to use what my fun produces doesn’t suddenly require me to have my fun in a specific way. It doesn’t obligate me to ensure the output of my fun never breaks your production environment.
Hexarei@beehaw.orgto
Programming@programming.dev•Open source is a thankless job and I think we've lost the plot on how we treat maintainers
1·3 months agoAnd you’re still wrong. They don’t owe anything to anyone, legally or morally.
Hexarei@beehaw.orgto
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•no one talks about this but i think we should be way more careful from now on.English
20·3 months agoReddit has no power here!
Hexarei@beehaw.orgto
Programming@programming.dev•Open source is a thankless job and I think we've lost the plot on how we treat maintainers
1·3 months agoFrom the license:
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT.
An open source dev is owed nothing and owes nothing.
By stating otherwise, you are trying to say that the person who releases something, on their own time and expense for free and probably fun, has an obligation to conduct themselves in a manner you think is best.
But… They don’t. This isn’t even really a debate worth having, because there’s nothing to debate. You’re just wrong.
Yeah, but if you want privacy, it’s a fine idea to prevent public networks and such from examining your traffic patterns. My personal main use case for a self-hosted VPN is for using public networks for private traffic, and I wouldn’t suggest doing hardcore high volume piracy through such a thing.
The idea of using one for piracy is more focused on finding a VPS provider that can accept cryptocurrency and doesn’t require your personal details.
Edit: whoops, realized I got the premises backwards in my earlier comment. Sorry about that.
Host one yourself on a cloud host that accepts cryptocurrency and asks no questions, if you want to do piracy. Otherwise if you’re just trying to get your traffic cloaked for privacy reasons, a digital ocean droplet or a hetzner instance running OpenVPN is plenty.
Hexarei@beehaw.orgto
Technology@beehaw.org•"There's a Secret Backdoor in Netgear" Routers, ft. Wendell of Level1 Techs - GamersNexus
2·4 months agoThis is why I built my own router running opnsense





My understanding is that by going into the bathroom we only increase the risk of a trans person getting assaulted