Don’t you mean delve your hands after delving that

PoopOS

I’m not aware of any external factors like that, but Thor 4 itself is generally considered to be “too much Taika Waititi”

Finally someone else who shares this opinion!

Software Engineer

Well… yes. In America the diet right supports the top, and the far right supports the top even harder. The 3 actual leftists support the bottom. So it’s still true.

Hmm, fair

Yup

Beautiful!

It’s not a well-reasoned feeling, I’m sure if I saw the numbers on the energy production vs cost etc., I could form a better opinion on it. As-is I will support both nuclear and solar, since they’re both clearly better than fossil fuels.

It’s good and has few downsides, but I feel like we kind of missed the boat and solar is the move now.

That is objectively the incorrect rejection reason

Yeah, choosing to establish the semver social contract and then break it is not great

I don’t think it’s valid to simultaneously present open-source as a legitimate alternative for paid software, while also saying you can’t have expectations of the software or trust its guarantees (ie. semver) because it’s just a volunteer project. If you’re presenting your OSS in the serious space of choices for its niche, it will (and should be!) held to a high standard. If it can’t be, then don’t present it as a real alternative. I’ve noticed this (mostly-unintentional) conflation between serious OSS competitors and hobby projects in almost every discussion on this topic I’ve seen.

The second issue was too blatant, I knew I was getting the old 4chan bait and switch

A dick

Please state your argument more clearly

Clue

“Sorry, I meant no meaning yes.”

"No meaning yes?"

I provide provisions. TO THE WARFRONT! MARCH!