Proof?

Yeah I think that pretty clearly falls under extenuating circumstances

Thank you for your service 🫡

Wait that’s actually such a good idea

Me cranking the handle on my pillow to inflate it at 3am

So?

Ooh clever. I was able to get around mine by opening sites in an iframe, I made a bookmarklet for it

https://xkcd.com/1683/

He’s dead. Calling it now.

Oh those price tags make me happy

I’m pretty sure they are actually

Really high quality discussion man. Your views are well informed and updated to align with reality and totally not unhinged.

Ah, but does it mean “people who have no purpose:”, or does it mean “people, for no reason:”

Good point! The amount of crackpot “here’s how we can fix society” ideas I’ve come up with that are completely ruined by the existence of children is honestly crazy. I know “protect the kids!!” has been co-opted for some rather unsavory agendas, but it really is important, moreso even than we often consider.

You could cover this pretty accurately by making being in public without vaccinations count as reckless endangerment. In theory, an antivaxx person in isolation is not the issue. The issue is them exposing other people.

they can’t

They can

Figma balls

Those look similar to crepes (American)

Would you care to explain?

Strength, as in the power to exert your will on others, is a dangerous concept. This is the sense in which fascists use it.

Strength, as in the power to stand up for yourself, is good. We should all have the strength to fight against tyranny.