Because calling him a proven-in-court-but-technically-not-convicted-because-it-was-a-civil-trial rapist takes too long.
EpeeGnome
I keep picking instances that don’t last. I’m formerly known as:
@EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
@EpeeGnome@lemmy.fmhy.net
@EpeeGnome@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz
@EpeeGnome@lemmy.fmhy.ml
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
Joined 24 days ago
Cake day: June 5th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
EpeeGnome@feddit.onlineto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•A genie grants you a wish at random: you're guaranteed to win your next argument. Who do you argue with?English3·20 days agoYeah, this really depends on what you meant by winning here. Are we actually changing the other person’s mind or do they admit we are right, but still believe otherwise? Are people who witness the argument included? Do people continue to agree indefinitely? Does it change reality to match?
lol. This is such an idiotic thing to do. “Hey, you know that linguistic pattern matcher that doesn’t actually reason or introspect? Since it can talk, why don’t we just ask it what it can and can’t do?” Seeing this, published by an AI research institute no less, is what inspired the creators of the actually riggourus test the article is about. It inspired me with a desire to smack those idiots upside their empty heads.