You’re not entirely wrong…
I have no sympathy for GAFAM, nor for Mozilla.
You’re not entirely wrong…
+1 for Hetzner
They keep debating and polluting my inbox when I said I won’t reply anymore.
People using Linux should take their heads out of their asses sometimes and just let people enjoy things they way they prefer.
Because they prefer to use something else.
Nothing new. Mozilla could disappear tomorrow and a few dozens of people may notice it, if even. They’re basically useless at this point.
Let me just say… LOL
In the case of Brave (or Vivaldi, to a certain extent) it doesn’t matter too much, as it has a very capable built-in adblocker. It’s not an extension, so it is not going to be weakened by MV3.
The need for latex, in 1999.
YW 😄
I have a couple of no-brand SATA-USB enclosers with some jmicron chipset. Can’t remember the exact chipset right now, as my RPi is not working ATM (see edit).
sudo smartctl -a /dev/sdX should do the job
Yeah, I use something like this, a no-brand enclosure.
I’m using a couple of cheap Kingston A400 for my setup (120 and 480 GB) and they work just fine. One thing I noticed is that the 120 GB one’s health went down to 92%, from 100%, in “just” one year (smart parameter). But that’s implies a lifetime of more that 12 years, so I’m not excessively concerned.
EDIT: of course, just after writing this comment the smaller SSD began to behave strangely (errors in dmesg).
Or they just have differente priorities and preferences, you know. THe same reason they use Linux instead of $SOMEOTHEROS.
I think that this form is actually old, from when BTRFS was quite unstable. That point on the list made me chuckle.
Who cares… Inbuilt adblockers are not affected by MV3.
Papara Linux