lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nl to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoVal(r)u(l)efeddit.nlimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1117arrow-down19
arrow-up1108arrow-down1imageVal(r)u(l)efeddit.nllnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nl to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squarepetrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 months agoThat’d be nice. 90 and 120 are rolling through the greens. Are posters mostly green? That seems odd to me.
minus-squarebob_lemon@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up16·2 months agoThe problem is that averaging hue makes no sense at all because hue is not a longest scale. If you take a red poster (0) and a blue poster (240), it averages to green. Or take red (0) and red (359), averaging to cyan (180).
minus-squareflying_sheep@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 months agoThe average of 0° and 359° is obviously 359.5°. it’s a radial scale.
minus-squarebob_lemon@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoBy that logic, the average of red and cyan is both purple and lime. Still useless.
minus-squareflying_sheep@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoNot if there is a clear trend. If most movie posters are blue, three average will be blue. But i agree, it is useless if there is no clear trend.
minus-squareStarbuncle@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoI wouldn’t trust someone who tried to visualize hue like this to make that calculation correctly.
minus-squareflying_sheep@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoYou know what, I completely agree.
minus-squareStarbuncle@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoIt would have made more sense if they had shown the distribution of hue as a polar graph and just had one every decade to show how it changes over time.
That’d be nice.
90 and 120 are rolling through the greens. Are posters mostly green? That seems odd to me.
The problem is that averaging hue makes no sense at all because hue is not a longest scale.
If you take a red poster (0) and a blue poster (240), it averages to green. Or take red (0) and red (359), averaging to cyan (180).
The average of 0° and 359° is obviously 359.5°.
it’s a radial scale.
By that logic, the average of red and cyan is both purple and lime. Still useless.
Not if there is a clear trend. If most movie posters are blue, three average will be blue.
But i agree, it is useless if there is no clear trend.
I wouldn’t trust someone who tried to visualize hue like this to make that calculation correctly.
You know what, I completely agree.
It would have made more sense if they had shown the distribution of hue as a polar graph and just had one every decade to show how it changes over time.