This is swiped from reddit but I thought it was really helpful so please don’t judge me too harshly lol.

So it turns out that some Linux distros don’t enable this by default for whatever reason but if you have an Intel wifi card that uses the iwlwifi driver (you can check this with lspci -k and look for a section that says Network controller: Intel Corporation and Kernel driver in use: iwlwifi under it), you can add a simple line to a config file that might make a huge difference to your wifi speeds.

Just edit /etc/modprobe.d/iwlwifi.conf (if it doesn’t exist just create it) and add the line: options iwlwifi 11n_disable=8 then reboot. I ran Speedtest before and after trying this on my laptop and it seems to have increased it by about 20% or so.

Your mileage may vary of course, but hopefully this helps someone!

  • gerdesj@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    Please do a little research before trying random stuff. After checking to see if you are actually using the iwlwifi module, why not find out a bit about whether the mentioned param. is available to you and what it does:

    Am I using the module. If the output from this is blank, then no:

    $ lsmod | grep iwlwifi
    iwlwifi               622592  1 iwlmvm
    cfg80211             1331200  3 iwlmvm,iwlwifi,mac80211
    
    

    Also verify with lspci -k as above:

    $ lspci -k | grep iwlwifi -A2 -B2
            DeviceName: WLAN
            Subsystem: Intel Corporation Raptor Lake PCH CNVi WiFi
            Kernel driver in use: iwlwifi
            Kernel modules: iwlwifi
    00:15.0 Serial bus controller: Intel Corporation Alder Lake PCH Serial IO I2C Controller #0 (rev 01)
            Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Alder Lake PCH Serial IO I2C Controller
    
    
    # modinfo iwlwifi
       ...
    parm:           swcrypto:using crypto in software (default 0 [hardware]) (int)
    parm:           11n_disable:disable 11n functionality, bitmap: 1: full, 2: disable agg TX, 4: disable agg RX, 8 enable agg TX (uint)
    parm:           amsdu_size:amsdu size 0: 12K for multi Rx queue devices, 2K for AX210 devices, 4K for other devices 1:4K 2:8K 3:12K (16K buffers) 4: 2K (default 0) (int)
    parm:           fw_restart:restart firmware in case of error (default true) (bool)
    parm:           nvm_file:NVM file name (charp)
    parm:           uapsd_disable:disable U-APSD functionality bitmap 1: BSS 2: P2P Client (default: 3) (uint)
    parm:           enable_ini:0:disable, 1-15:FW_DBG_PRESET Values, 16:enabled without preset value defined,Debug INI TLV FW debug infrastructure (default: 16) (uint)
    parm:           bt_coex_active:enable wifi/bt co-exist (default: enable) (bool)
    parm:           led_mode:0=system default, 1=On(RF On)/Off(RF Off), 2=blinking, 3=Off (default: 0) (int)
    parm:           power_save:enable WiFi power management (default: disable) (bool)
    parm:           power_level:default power save level (range from 1 - 5, default: 1) (int)
    parm:           disable_11ac:Disable VHT capabilities (default: false) (bool)
    parm:           remove_when_gone:Remove dev from PCIe bus if it is deemed inaccessible (default: false) (bool)
    parm:           disable_11ax:Disable HE capabilities (default: false) (bool)
    parm:           disable_11be:Disable EHT capabilities (default: false) (bool)
    
    

    sysfs is a pseudo filesystem with lots of info in it. cat the files here:

    $ ls -l /sys/module/iwlwifi/parameters/
    
    

    … to see what your current values are set at. You can install sysfstools and run this for a neat report:

    $ systool -vm iwlwifi
    Module = "iwlwifi"
    
      Attributes:
         ...
      Parameters:
        11n_disable         = "0"
        amsdu_size          = "0"
        bt_coex_active      = "Y"
        disable_11ac        = "N"
        disable_11ax        = "N"
        disable_11be        = "N"
        enable_ini          = "16"
        fw_restart          = "Y"
        led_mode            = "0"
        nvm_file            = "(null)"
        power_level         = "0"
        power_save          = "N"
        remove_when_gone    = "N"
        swcrypto            = "0"
        uapsd_disable       = "3"
    
    
  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    Just throwing this out there: on my hardware, this improves my upload but hurts my download speeds. There could possibly be reasons why it’s not set by default.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      I tried it out on another laptop since I posted this, and that had the inverse - download speeds went up by about 20% or so, but the upload speed seems have taken a hit of about 10%. On my ‘main’ laptop both improved quite drastically.

      So yeah definitely a ‘your mileage may vary’ type of situation, but it’s easy enough to reverse I guess so worth a shot if anyone has a bit of a speed problem. You might get lucky!

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think i read about this once. Something like, Windows has less strict requirements for drivers and hardware, which is why driver-side workarounds for broken hw works better there. Or something like that.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not sure if this is the same setting but a linux podcast noted one setting was not set by default (for speed) in order to keep power consumption lower

    • SteveTech@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think some people also use power_save=0 which would, but my understanding is 11n_disable=8 enables aggregating transmit packets together, which impacts latency but improves upload speed.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      No worries! From other comments and a couple of tests I did it seems to get somewhat mixed results, but it’s easy enough to undo so you might get lucky! It worked for me at least lol.