I’d like to thank the admins for being so open and direct about the issues that they’re facing.

  • Greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even with ASGs, ec2 costs a bomb for performance.

    And “serverless” functions are a trap.

    If you’re gonna commit to reserved instances, just buy hardware for goodness sake, its a 3 year commitment with a huge upfront spend.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And “serverless” functions are a trap.

      How are serverless functions a trap? They seem like a great cheap option for simple CRUD / client > server > db apps (what most apps end up being).

      • Greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anything that is “cheap” to do on serverless is cheaper to do on a $5 droplet, especially once it starts to grow.

        Serverless gets you to buy in to a vendors lock-in.

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Interesting, I’ll check out droplets, but in my experience with Azure Functions there’s not much vendor lock in. My API was just a normal Node.js / express server, the only part that was locked in to Azure Functions was the format for the endpoint definitions, but those can be adjusted in like an hour’s worth of time to anything else