• agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 days ago

    On the contrary, I was one of many who breathed a little easier voting for Harris because he was on the ticket. The general wisdom is you choose a VP that scoops demographics that the ticket head misses. Just because you don’t care doesn’t mean no one does. I’m sure Vance scooped a couple shy demographics for Trump.

    I like Walz. My leftist Minnesotan friends like Walz. He’s a likeable guy, he seems remarkably leftist for his demographic, which is the highly electable “old white dude”. The people who care about VPs will care that it’s AOC, and the people who don’t will see a friendly, straight-shootin’ white dude. Have a sense of strategy for Marx’s sake.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Sure, that’s the conventional wisdom but it seems like you’re missing that this is quite literally exactly what they said about Walz and Harris and we already know how that played out. I’m not sure how many times we have to do this the safe way before people start to understand that the safe option isn’t what people want.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        this is quite literally exactly what they said about Walz and Harris

        Howso? That’s not what I saw at all.

        I’m not sure how many times we have to do this the safe way before people start to understand that the safe option isn’t what people want.

        It is what most people want. There is a fraction of a percent of the population who wants the exact same outcome as you. Most of them just wanna mind their own business and try to be a good neighbor.

        You’re not going to radicalize 80 million people. Until the electoral mechanism is changed, you’re going to have to find the 80 million voter bloc that offends you the least and caucus with them.