

Yeah, like I said - it’s tone-deaf. That’s all I’m saying. It is a pattern, and it is not ideal, but if I found ‘not ideal’ was a reason to not support people doing legitimate good in the world, I would be an even shittier person than I already am.
I legitimately wish her the best, and have been in support of her actions for a long time. But the immediate group-think of defending every word out of her mouth is not helpful - rhetoric has influence, and it’s overwhelmingly not the politically involved like us who need to be convinced by the message, but ordinary, everyday, struggling people who are unlikely to respond well to being chided for not dropping the entirety of their lives to do the ‘bare minimum’. It is a privileged thing to say, and it unfortunately will be seen as such by many who need to hear the importance of opposing the genocide in Palestine and the abuses of the Israeli government.
Honestly, if it wasn’t the title, I probably wouldn’t have picked up on it. What we choose to amplify and emphasize as those who are involved in spreading the message is also part of rhetoric. And also honestly, if I wasn’t in a place as left-wing as the Fediverse, I probably wouldn’t have brought it up on my own - audience matters.
Again, that it is a pattern in her rhetoric is part of the concern - and that it is a common issue with many other middle-class leftist activists suggests that it is not some extreme abnormality that should be just ignored.
And again, like I said, Greta Thunberg is doing legitimate good in the world, and a hell of a lot more than I probably would manage in her position.
It is certainly a double-edged sword that she has found herself wielding, and a broad condemnation for being imperfect would be unfair, especially as she’s still at college age - fuck, the number of unfortunate implications in my own words at that age would shame me, not for malice, but simply for lack of exposure to why they had shitty implications. At the same time, the refusal of many left-wing audiences to acknowledge problems with this style of rhetoric, and with anything Greta has said or done in particular, is a problem. Speaking from a position of privilege to a largely unprivileged audience is a very delicate position, and online communities trying to paper over any raised eyebrows with “You’re just jealous” is the kind of lunacy results in echo chambers and a detachment from the actual conditions and opinions of the general population, which is key to rational and effective political action.