stephen01king

Like I said, writers have no problem writing for Wikipedia. You can enjoy emailing writers to add to your torrent collection and donating to them directly.

I really love your fake concern about writers being paid yet never once addressed my points about donating to them. Guess it wasn’t that important to you, in the end.

Where did that download come from? Who compiled all those written information into something that can be downloaded by you?

Try making a compilation of information directly through torrents from scratch and tell me how far you get with that. I’m sure you’ll find that most people do not want to go through that hassle.

You’re severely underestimating the value of making it easy to compile the information in the first place. And again, those information do not need to be compiled to wikipedia by the writers. They do so because of the value provided by the service.

The question is, do you think the writers will get paid any better by you sharing their work through torrents than through wikipedia? I don’t think so. If you actually cared about this, go and donate to the writers instead of devaluing the contribution of wikipedia in compiling these information.

The articles don’t get written without the servers running, and the writers are not forced to write them. Wikipedia is a free service to share information, so writers are using it as a service, not as an employee. They could have easily not used wikipedia.

Saying they should be paid is like saying developers should be paid for sharing their code on Github. What you actually want is to follow the FOSS model and donate to the Wikipedia writers directly, not expect the foundation to pay people who use their service for free.

Did you think they run their servers using volunteers?

I don’t know, it looks pretty interesting. Certainly not worse than series like Are You Afraid of the Dark, which I loved as a kid.

Given the current state of the world, I would say his greedy capitalistic mindset that puts profit over integrity makes him pretty evil, imo.

I do feel like that sometimes, so completely understandable.

If you were looking for consistency, that is by definition you looking for the same result, which is not covered in the definition of insanity.

Unfortunately, the troll here is the one who can’t be bothered to read people’s comment before replying. Try again.

It’s unstable because it’s a new file system, not because the guy is a shit programmer. Did you even read your second link? It repeats the exact reason we’ve all tried to tell you, that it was removed because Kent keeps releasing new features during release candidate period.

Also, I don’t get why you can’t discuss things in a civil manner. Is this why you keep insisting that Kent’s project is not being removed because of his attitude, but because of his lack of skill? Are you scared of admitting that your attitude will one day get you treated the same way as Kent’s does?

Again, please post proof of what you’re saying here. All I’ve seen from this issue had been his problematic attitude, not his code quality.

God damn, Ireland is one based country.

Basically, descriptive naming is good unless its so generic you have trouble searching for it on search engines or it becomes the focus of search results when you’re searching for the general term for it.

I suspected it was that one. I never knew it had anything to do with Scientology when I first watched it, I just know that it was pretty terrible. Thanks for the answer.

Which one was the propaganda movie?

At least I loved the series enough to start reading the novel, so that’s a good thing.

If you’re using the browser, the Piefed main page is a lot more data efficient, if you care about that sort of thing.

Yep, finally some proper use of AI instead of shoving them down our throats.

I’m guessing you hate The Man from U.N.C.L.E and Stardust?

What you said applies to most celebrities and CEOs, other than the ridiculous white clothing part. Hopefully you realised that the world has always worked that stupidly.