when more and different people get involved for different reasons then they will change things. since a lot of growth has come from nearby gamer communities, they will bring those habits and forms with them.

opera

lots of people know about firefox, they would just never use it.

Like everything else Syncthing, it works well when it is working well.

Far from foolproof.

Is that a mock up you made or something that exists?

Check this one out: https://store.kde.org/p/1985239

Thank you! I do not understand this. One way is blue and the other way is green… I have had to go into another panel where I know how I set something before, and look how the check boxes are there in order to discern the correct way to use them.

I used to use typora; it does have a really nice convert web->markdown. I think that it is done by some javascript or something because the other tools that have comparable quality I can think of off the top of my head are obsidian, joplin clipper and a couple of firefox extensions. I agree that in my experience pandoc and a couple other cli tools didn’t produce such nice results.

I also think in all those cases the browser is doing some of the work because it renders the page, discards a lot of irrelevant stuff, then you copy/convert just a selection portion of what’s visible. Whereas if you, for example, grab a raw html page through curl and send it to pandoc, none of that is done. You probably aren’t using Select All when you copy a page to typora, but pandoc would be faced with the entire page. I don’t know if there is a way to access the Reader View from the terminal but it would go a distance to cleaning up your pandoc conversion if you could start from there (for those sites on which it’s available).

I tried and failed to do the same thing but it’s not markdown’s fault. No matter how many bells and whistles markdown would get, the issue is in the conversion from html part.

Sorry I was trying to follow your meaning, because the example of absent rich text you gave was underlines. There is already basic text formatting support such as strong, emphasis, headings and links.

You could style any, all or none of those to have underlining. Whatever chosen rendering, they all have meaning independent from the applied style. What you are asking for is to have something that is purely a display style without any structural value. This is not coming to markdown any time soon. Hardly anyone uses underline as its own thing in html anymore, for good reasons.

Maybe this article will help to further explain.

Native SVG handling would be completely out of scope. The point of markdown is that it is supposed to be understandable in its plain text format. SVG is incompatible with that. The closest thing would be like mermaid charts but I think it’s quite a stretch even then.

I think you should just use HTML, it has a much larger array of tools that would suit your needs. Markdown is purposely constrained because it enables much more portability.

Mailman

When I do free tech support for someone who I think could have solved it themselves I just make them solve it themselves by asking questions. “What information do you have?” “What have you tried?” “What does the error say?” “What do you think the error means? Is it giving a hint?” “When did you start having the problem?” “What can we eliminate?” “What did a search search suggest?” “What does the documentation say?”

“Did you try rebooting, reconnecting?”

My personal bias is being pro markdown. I do not know groff so below is based on some inferences on my part.

But I don’t think markdown is suitable for man pages, which contain specific kinds of information structured in a prescribed way. Markdown doesn’t and can’t know about these.

As I understand it, because of using a more sophisticated structure than MD, its possible to do things like:

• shell completion can be generated automatically from the man pages.
• a website like mankier.com which renders man pages in HTML and adds hyperlinks every time an option or argument

That’s not rich text. Rich text is when a format is applied without structural reason.

You could have a markdown interpreter that displayed **this** *this* or _this_ using any arbitrary format. You could change the color, weight, border, drop shadow, opacity, mouse over effects, font face… Any attribute.

Lemmy has conventions but all * really means is emphasis.

If you want to save a website use html

Someone can correct this but iirc some implementations of markdown have image options like this:

![alt text](/path/to/IMG.png|200px "description text")

Others put the size in { } after the main image item.

Rich text is contrary to the structural focus of markdown. Why should it be added?

There are a couple of apps on f droid that implement this with SMS.

This is true, here is a brief list: https://www.libreoffice.org/discover/who-uses-libreoffice/

But I’m sure it is a massive project you would need to have sufficient motivation at all levels. Not at all a trivial project.

I am curious how these changes feel on-the-ground to the affected workers who had no personal interest in linux or free software.

It is a question I’ve spent a lot of time trying to work out. Can’t speak to docker.

Some of the specifics of Keeps and Dontkeeps depend on details of your system. You have to find out where the distro, DM and other apps keep the following:

Dontkeeps:

• trashes
• temp files
• file indexes … IMHO these dont backup properly if you leave them in and will prevent you from completing the task
• device files

Keeps:

• list of installed packages — explicit and deps separate if possible
• config files: /etc, ~/.config, ~/.* on a case by case basis… I say remove the obvious large temp dirs and keep the rest by default for simplicity
  • for the system configs I’ve had a tool called etckeeper running for a while because it was highly recommended but I’ve never actually restored from it…
• personal documents and other files such as typically kept in the home directory
• /root occasionally has something you need

Ways to investigate:

• use a disk usage utility to find out where your storage is being used up … It’ll help you find large Dontkeeps
• watch for recently modified files
• dirs and files that are modified all the time are usually temp dirs. But sometimes they have something useful like your firefox profile.

Most backup solutions are ONE of the following:

1. User files
2. System files

Don’t spend too much time crying about needing two solutions. Just make your backup today and reach perfection later.

Remember: sync isn’t backup. Test your backup if you can (but its not as easy as it sounds). Off site your most precious files.

Dont you have to power off the system and boot from clonezilla image to crea5e the backup?

I have also been confounded by the situation.

It is even worse when you are on the secondary market. The company’s product pages are broken. Trying to compare across different release years is way harder.

I assumed the reason for this had to do with the production systems and supply chains. They can get a certain number of x parts at y price from a factory located in a given location. You get enough parts in proximity to each other and you make it a model.

Its one thing for a small company to have enough components to have only a few models but with the volume dell or HP moves, they would need to really invest in suppliers or actually make the components themselves.

I dont imagine the marketing people have come up with all the options, they’re just the ones who have to try to sell want they’re given.

I’ve not used Guix but I don’t think any distro has anything close to number of desirable available packages as arch— so be prepared for that. My ventures into debian, suse and fedora were made quite annoying by having to work around the many missing packages. Including user-facing applications, dependencies and background programs. I never quite got down with distrobox, maybe that’s the cure.

this chart on wikipedia gives the impression that Debian has more packages but that’s not the way it feels when you are looking for something. Maybe they have a lot of dot matrix printer libraries from 1992 or something which bring the number up.

Arch includes a lot of not-at-all-free packages (which it is impossible to distinguish in pacman or other tool as far as I can find), orphaned, new packages that haven’t yet made it into other repos, and packages where no attempt has been made to submit them to other repos.

On arch I have virtually never had to go outside the repos for packages. It’s very hard to give up once you are used to it. (Even though it’s better to use properly libre/free stuff and other benefits of a more curated approach like security, stability and quality.)