You’re making an [incorrect] assumption and then challenging people to prove it to you.
Idk if this is rage bait, AI trolling, or you’re trying to get people to do your debate class homework for you, but you’re not gonna get anyone with any braincells to say science has weaknesses.
You might as well be asking someone to prove to you the drawbacks of breathing. Sure, someone could twist their brain to come up with something, but any answer will be contrived to fit your inane question.
Wtf is this question? How is “we can do it in groups” specifically a strength? You can also do science alone. Is this asking about some high school chemistry class?
The question is never “should we do science” because the answer is always yes. The question should be “what knowledge can we gain from science”.
Everyone knows when you drop an apple, it hits the ground. Science explores the reasoning for why it happens, and opens understanding for other fields that can apply the same principles like civil engineering, rocket science, space exploration, etc…
I could see this being more like code blocks instead of actual software engineering. He probably found the different language modules and stuck them all in, and then did the equivalent of changes to a config file.
Does this also apply to /c/femcelmemes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
What is your specific use case for this? Is it you using rm -rf, and you’re afraid you’ll use it irresponsibly, or are you a sysadmin setting up an environment for someone else?
In what way are file permissions not sufficient?
Yup, I get it. I’m just saying the governing body that controls visas don’t give a shit that locals get priced out, or that a place lost its authentic charm.
Tourism brings money into the host country. The people who care about over tourism aren’t the same people who control visas.
This is how flat earth and antivax caught on
3 pink-skin pigs.
Source: I’m human
I kind of get it though. If I were the client in this situation I would trust closed source Google way more than some self-hosted app I’ve never heard of, which could be subject to user-manipulation.
That being said, for personal or nonprofessional use, this thing seems fantastic, especially from a privacy perspective.
Voting is such an easy thing it makes no sense to purposely not do it. You don’t lose anything by voting, but risk losing everything by not voting.
People who refuse to vote as a protest aren’t demonstrating anything. So all they can do is constantly brag about how they don’t vote in an attempt to dissuade others as well.
I’m sure this thread can only lead to productive discourse.
I have nothing to add
I just also want to be told to “Kick rocks, communist”
Just because its free doesn’t mean it isn’t an ad.
Also, don’t kid yourself, it’s freemium. Making open source projects like this and then having a paid tier is a VERY common business strategy. Again, this isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but be honest about what you’re doing at least.
At this point you’re really just embarrassing yourself. Delete this entire post and save yourself from the bad publicity.
Edit:
removed link to pricing page to prevent driving more traffic. Project charges for hosting per customer with price breaks for more users
I think you don’t understand how advertising works. This is an obvious ad, which is fine, but the fact is, it is very low effort.
Why would anyone click an ad just based on a name of a product alone? It could be propaganda, a Rick Roll, or a 30minute video that takes 15min to explain what it is, and then I find out it’s something I don’t want anyway. Huge waste of time for everyone.
Refusing to explain what this is, and insisting people click your link is very obviously a weak attempt to raise the video’s view count.
What you should do instead is explain what it is, why its different than other alternatives, and only then encourage users who want to learn more.
You eat negative calories only, so that your head looks giant in proportion to the rest of your body
No. A copy of an artist’s work is never “superior” to the original. Having to create from a blank canvas is way more impressive than duplicating what someone already did.
But also this question sounds like it’s about to lead to AI apologetics.
Solutions focused.
No one cares about “federation” or “decentralized”.
They do care about contingency in the event of enshittification, algorithms that don’t invade privacy, and viable replacements for the apps they already use.
People like to talk, and often already debate real life things to a level that borderlines on tedium, but they enjoy it. Anyone who has been in a group of academics in a conversation are familiar with this.
When it comes to fiction, I don’t look into it too deeply, but suspension of disbelief only goes so far. The logic of the work must make some kind of sense in the world that it takes place.
And the most important:
This is why I’m not a big fan of “magic” because it seems like a lazy way to explain a phenomenon in fiction.