That sounds fun! It is below minimum wage where I live, but i had to check that just now. If not for other responsibilities or having a totally different career to build towards, yes I would do that.

Really depends what the job is.

Yes I guess so. So we should assume (at least in “1st world countries”) that lower pop. density means wealthier residents? Works for me, because in my country try the wealthiest people retreat to the countryside and coast, living in villages

They are wealthy in road space and parking space

TIL! What an interesting place

That’s a good shout! I’d love to hear peoples suggestions for specific places

Still valuable to me - it identifies money-flight, e.g are rich people in one town moving to a specific few suburbs instead of staying in the city centre?

We can do it on a per-neighbourhood basis and include things like villages

I still define those as cities, and that’s basically part of what I wanted to identify, actually: which cities are using their space in inefficient ways and are not building in a dense way?

That being said, I have no problem with suburbia if they create actual vibrant gardens instead of lawns (which they never seem to do).

But if you had a statistic you could show to city councils and real estate saying “this area (e.g manhattan) is drawing in more tax than your area because it has people living densely,” you could hopefully change their minds about things.

This is true, and if the metric is intended to identify excess wealth of an overall town i would definitely include them in the equation - hypothetically might find that the city has like 100 square feet per person, but all the non rich sleep on the streets, so it becomes 5 square feet per person

Woah that sounds way more advanced than manufacturing in my country

I was on another device a day or so later and went back and I must have said something similar enough to get reported for evasion.

IP tracking too. It really annoys me that reddit insinuates it can “just tell” it’s you based on similar language usage, because:

• if they can, that’s still a fucking stupid and evil thing to do (invasion of privacy, drives userbase down, means punitive justice of bans isn’t worthwhile because people don’t get an opportunity to learn from, their mistake and thus not better culture is enforced following the event - the people left using reddit are cruel people who “get away with it” in some way.)
• if they can’t, they’re using nasty tracking tools and misleading the public about them.

I suppose they match the communities followed, so maybe you just followed the same set, in the same order - perhaps to make up for losing one account, you added all of its subreddits in the same order as “most-visited” among them.

In the Netherlands as well it’s fucking egregious. This is a country which places exceptionally high standards on driver behaviour and has, for decades, had a concerted effort to discourage car use full stop.

I thought of that too and forgot how it was spelled 😂

Hmm 👀 I probably can’t use it at college without looking like a massive cheater though

Women are software, boys are AI. They go to Jupiter to get stupider.

FLORIDA WOMAN

Seems like a Smallville subplot, right?

My kids art project, don’t be so mean

Yes and it culminated with them having to choose between trusting alien group A or B; alien group A look like hot ladies, alien group B look like needy sci fi men; they go with B, who are the good guys.

The movie uses the contemporary climate of homophobia to create a movie about guys who are suppressing their own sexuality

By reason for being do you mean “what someone tells themselves to justify that they’re still alive?” In which case I agree with diplomjodler that one doesn’t need a reason. But I suppose it would be the assumption that I’m a good person. I’ve been wrestling with that a lot recently.

If you mean the process that lead to me being created, I’d say soapy teddies is the flaw in that.